Comparison between N13NH3-PET and 99mTc-Tetrofosmin-CZT SPECT in the evaluation of absolute myocardial blood flow and flow reserve.

BACKGROUND: PET/CT is the standard for quantitative assessments of myocardial blood flow (MBF), but it requires short-lived-tracers, costly, and not widely available. SPECT with Cadmium Zinc Telluride (CZT) detectors allows dynamic acquisition and quantitation of MBF. The study aims were to compare MBF measurements by 99mTc-tetrofosmin-CZT to N13NH3 PET/CT after regadenoson-induced coronary hyperemia and to evaluate the effect of attenuation correction (AC). METHODS: 54 patients were evaluated at rest and during vasodilation by 99mTc-tetrofosmin-CZT and N13NH3 PET/CT within 2 weeks. MBF and MBF reserve (MFR) were measured by CZT with or without AC (NAC). RESULTS: The global rest MBF was 0.76 ± 0.19 mL/min/gr by PET and 0.76 ± 0.24 by AC-CZT (P = NS) and 1.14 ± 0.4 by NAC-CZT (P < 0.001 vs PET and AC-CZT). Stress MBF was higher when measured by PET than AC-CZT (1.87 ± 0.45 vs 1.62 ± 0.68 mL/min/gr, P < 0.0008), but lower than NAC-CZT (2.36 ± 1.1, P < 0.0003). The MBF reserve ratio (MFR) was higher by PET than AC-CZT (2.52 ± 0.56 vs 2.22 ± 1 (P < 0.009) and NAC-CZT (2.18 ± 1.0, P < 0.004). Linear regression was better between PET (MFR and stress MBF) and AC-CZT than between PET and NAC-CZT. ROC curve analysis showed the significant ability of AC-CZT to predict MFR < 2 and stress MBF < 1.7 (AUC = 0.75 and 0.82 respectively) and to differentiate between normal and CAD patients (AUC = 0.747 and 0.892 for MFR and stress MBF, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Our data show a reasonable correlation between MBF and MFR measured by N13NH3-PET and 99mTc-Tetrofosmin-CZT SPECT. NAC-CZT overestimates MBF. AC is recommended when using CZT for measuring MBF.