Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of the quality of the information received during head and neck cancer announcement: Prospective two-center study.
Thibouw, François; Duvillard, Christian; Thibouw, David; Bertaut, Aurélie; Blanc, Julie; Vulquin, Noémie; Chevalier, Cédric; Guigou, Caroline; Folia, Mireille.
Afiliação
  • Thibouw F; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Center François-Mitterrand, Dijon, France.
  • Duvillard C; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Center François-Mitterrand, Dijon, France.
  • Thibouw D; Department of Radiotherapy, Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, France.
  • Bertaut A; Clinical research center of Methodology and Biostatistics Unit, Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, France.
  • Blanc J; Clinical research center of Methodology and Biostatistics Unit, Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, France.
  • Vulquin N; Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, France.
  • Chevalier C; Department of Radiotherapy, Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, France.
  • Guigou C; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Center François-Mitterrand, Dijon, France.
  • Folia M; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Center François-Mitterrand, Dijon, France.
Head Neck ; 42(8): 1800-1810, 2020 08.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32091638
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Providing patient with cancer with appropriate information following the disclosure of a cancer diagnosis has multiple benefits. The objective was to evaluate the quality of the information received during an announcement for head and neck cancer and to determine predictive factors.

METHODS:

We conducted a prospective two-center study using self-questionnaires to assess the patient's perception of the quality of the announcement.

RESULTS:

Satisfaction scores on the information provided about the overall disease were 7.7/10. The main positive predictors of quality were a satisfactory consultation setting (P = .004), assessment of pain by a physician (P = .04), physician availability (P = .003), accurate information about tumor stage, quality of information regarding the type (P < .0001) and purpose (P = .001) of treatment and its side effects (P = .006), and the interview with the oncology nurse coordinator (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS:

Patients who received the announcement of head and neck cancer perceived the information received during the pretherapeutic period as satisfactory.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Head Neck Assunto da revista: NEOPLASIAS Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: França

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Head Neck Assunto da revista: NEOPLASIAS Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: França