Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Doxorubicin plus dacarbazine, doxorubicin plus ifosfamide, or doxorubicin alone as a first-line treatment for advanced leiomyosarcoma: A propensity score matching analysis from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group.
D'Ambrosio, Lorenzo; Touati, Nathan; Blay, Jean-Yves; Grignani, Giovanni; Flippot, Ronan; Czarnecka, Anna M; Piperno-Neumann, Sophie; Martin-Broto, Javier; Sanfilippo, Roberta; Katz, Daniela; Duffaud, Florence; Vincenzi, Bruno; Stark, Daniel P; Mazzeo, Filomena; Tuchscherer, Armin; Chevreau, Christine; Sherriff, Jenny; Estival, Anna; Litière, Saskia; Sents, Ward; Ray-Coquard, Isabelle; Tolomeo, Francesco; Le Cesne, Axel; Rutkowski, Piotr; Stacchiotti, Silvia; Kasper, Bernd; Gelderblom, Hans; Gronchi, Alessandro.
Afiliação
  • D'Ambrosio L; Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
  • Touati N; Sarcoma Unit, Division of Medical Oncology, Candiolo Cancer Institute-FPO, IRCCS, Candiolo, Italy.
  • Blay JY; European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium.
  • Grignani G; Leon Berard Center and Claude Bernard Lyon I University, EURACAN, LYRICAN, Lyon, France.
  • Flippot R; Sarcoma Unit, Division of Medical Oncology, Candiolo Cancer Institute-FPO, IRCCS, Candiolo, Italy.
  • Czarnecka AM; Department of Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif Cedex, France.
  • Piperno-Neumann S; Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Institute-Oncology Center, Gliwice, Poland.
  • Martin-Broto J; Department of Experimental Pharmacology, Mossakowski Medical Research Centre, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland.
  • Sanfilippo R; Medical Oncology Department, Curie Institute, Paris, France.
  • Katz D; Virgen del Rocio University Hospital, Institute of Biomedicine Research/CSIC/University of Seville, Seville, Spain.
  • Duffaud F; Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
  • Vincenzi B; Oncology Department, Sharett Institute of Oncology, Hadassah-Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel.
  • Stark DP; Medical Oncology - University Hospital Timone, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France.
  • Mazzeo F; Department of Medical Oncology, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
  • Tuchscherer A; St James's Institute of Oncology, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds and Leeds Teaching Hospitals National Health Service Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom.
  • Chevreau C; Medical Oncology, Clinique Universitaire Saint-Luc, Woluwe-Saint-Lambert, Belgium.
  • Sherriff J; Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
  • Estival A; Claudius Regaud Institute, University Cancer Institute of Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
  • Litière S; Cancer Centre, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
  • Sents W; Catalan Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Ray-Coquard I; European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium.
  • Tolomeo F; European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium.
  • Le Cesne A; Leon Berard Center and Claude Bernard Lyon I University, EURACAN, LYRICAN, Lyon, France.
  • Rutkowski P; Sarcoma Unit, Division of Medical Oncology, Candiolo Cancer Institute-FPO, IRCCS, Candiolo, Italy.
  • Stacchiotti S; Department of Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif Cedex, France.
  • Kasper B; Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Institute-Oncology Center, Gliwice, Poland.
  • Gelderblom H; Department of Experimental Pharmacology, Mossakowski Medical Research Centre, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland.
  • Gronchi A; Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Cancer ; 126(11): 2637-2647, 2020 06 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32129883
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The optimal treatment for advanced leiomyosarcoma is still debated. Given histotype-specific prospective controlled data lacking, this study retrospectively evaluated doxorubicin plus dacarbazine, doxorubicin plus ifosfamide, and doxorubicin alone as first-line treatments for advanced/metastatic leiomyosarcoma treated at European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group (EORTC-STBSG) sites.

METHODS:

The inclusion criteria were a confirmed histological diagnosis, treatment between January 2010 and December 2015, measurable disease (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1), an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤2, and an age ≥ 18 years. The endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and overall response rate (ORR). PFS was analyzed with methods for interval-censored data. Patients were matched according to their propensity scores, which were estimated with a logistic regression model accounting for histology, grade, age, sex, performance status, tumor site, and tumor extent.

RESULTS:

Three hundred three patients from 18 EORTC-STBSG sites were identified. One hundred seventeen (39%) received doxorubicin plus dacarbazine, 71 (23%) received doxorubicin plus ifosfamide, and 115 (38%) received doxorubicin. In the 212 propensity score-matched population (205 patients), the estimated median PFS was 9.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.2-9.7 months), 8.2 months (95% CI, 5.2-10.1 months), and 4.8 months (95% CI, 2.3-6.0 months) with ORRs of 30.9%, 19.5%, and 25.6% for doxorubicin plus dacarbazine, doxorubicin plus ifosfamide, and doxorubicin alone, respectively. PFS was significantly longer with doxorubicin plus dacarbazine versus doxorubicin (hazard ratio [HR], 0.72; 95% CI, 0.52-0.99). Doxorubicin plus dacarbazine was associated with longer OS (median, 36.8 months; 95% CI, 27.9-47.2 months) in comparison with both doxorubicin plus ifosfamide (median, 21.9 months; 95% CI, 16.7-33.4 months; HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.40-1.06) and doxorubicin (median, 30.3 months; 95% CI, 21.0-36.3 months; HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.43-0.99). Adjusted analyses retained an effect for PFS but not for OS. None of the factors selected for multivariate analysis had a significant interaction with the received treatment for both PFS and OS.

CONCLUSIONS:

This is the largest retrospective study of first-line treatment for advanced leiomyosarcoma. In the propensity score-matched population, doxorubicin and dacarbazine showed favorable activity in terms of both ORR and PFS and warrants further evaluation in prospective trials.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Sarcoma / Neoplasias Ósseas / Pontuação de Propensão / Leiomiossarcoma Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Cancer Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Itália

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Sarcoma / Neoplasias Ósseas / Pontuação de Propensão / Leiomiossarcoma Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Cancer Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Itália