Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Changes in motor unit bioelectrical activity recorded at two different sites in a muscle.
Dede, Hava Özlem; Sirin, Nermin Gorkem; Kocasoy-Orhan, Elif; Idrisoglu, Halil Atilla; Baslo, Mehmet Baris.
Afiliação
  • Dede HÖ; Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Department of Neurology, 34100 Istanbul Capa, Fatih Turkey. Electronic address: havaozlemdede@hotmail.com.
  • Sirin NG; Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Department of Neurology, 34100 Istanbul Capa, Fatih Turkey.
  • Kocasoy-Orhan E; Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Department of Neurology, 34100 Istanbul Capa, Fatih Turkey.
  • Idrisoglu HA; Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Department of Neurology, 34100 Istanbul Capa, Fatih Turkey.
  • Baslo MB; Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Department of Neurology, 34100 Istanbul Capa, Fatih Turkey.
Neurophysiol Clin ; 50(2): 113-118, 2020 Apr.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32171639
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

The objective of this study was to compare the properties of bioelectrical signals of motor units recorded at different sites in the muscles of controls, patients with myopathy and patients with motor neuron disease (MND).

METHODS:

Five controls, 10 patients with myopathy and 11 patients with MND were included. Electrophysiologic tests were performed in the biceps brachii (BB) muscle from two recording sites. Site 1 was near the belly of the muscle and Site 2 was 5cm distal from Site 1, near the tendon. Multi-motor unit potential (MUP) analysis, jitter analysis, and peak number count were calculated from the signals recorded using a concentric needle electrode (CN).

RESULTS:

At Site 2, duration was longer, number of phases was higher and amplitudes were smaller in MUPs compared with those recorded at Site 1. This significant difference between recording site and patient groups was related to neurogenic muscles. Jitter analysis showed no significant difference except an intergroup difference between the patient groups and controls. The peak number calculated using the CN was greater when recorded from Site 1 in concordance with MUP analysis.

CONCLUSION:

Duration of MUP was longer and amplitude was smaller when the recording electrode was placed distally along the muscle near the tendon in neurogenic muscles, probably related to increased temporal dispersion. However, changing the position of the needle did not provide further information in distinguishing myogenic muscles.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Músculo Esquelético / Agulhas Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Neurophysiol Clin Assunto da revista: FISIOLOGIA / NEUROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Músculo Esquelético / Agulhas Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Neurophysiol Clin Assunto da revista: FISIOLOGIA / NEUROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article