Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Is Physiologic Stress Test with Imaging Comparable to Anatomic Examination of Coronary Arteries by Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography to Investigate Coronary Artery Disease? - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Siddiqui, Waqas J; Rawala, Muhammad Shabbir; Abid, Waqas; Zain, Muhammad; Sadaf, Murrium I; Abbasi, Danish; Alvarez, Chikezie; Mansoor, Farah; Hasni, Syed Farhan; Aggarwal, Sandeep.
Afiliação
  • Siddiqui WJ; Cardiology/Nephrology, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, USA.
  • Rawala MS; Internal Medicine, Charleston Area Medical Center, Charleston, USA.
  • Abid W; Interventional Radiology, Christiana Hospital, Newark, USA.
  • Zain M; Internal Medicine, Sheikh Zayed Medical College and Hospital, Rahim Yar Khan, PAK.
  • Sadaf MI; Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, USA.
  • Abbasi D; Cardiovascular Diseases, University of Arkansas, Little Rock, USA.
  • Alvarez C; Medicine, St. Francis Medical Center, Trenton, USA.
  • Mansoor F; Medicine, Dow University, Karachi, PAK.
  • Hasni SF; Heart Failure and Transplant, Albert Einstein Hospital, Philadelphia, USA.
  • Aggarwal S; Nephrology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.
Cureus ; 12(2): e6941, 2020 Feb 10.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32190493
ABSTRACT
Objective Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) is a noninvasive diagnostic modality that remains underutilized compared to functional stress testing (ST) for investigating coronary artery disease (CAD). Several patients are misdiagnosed with noncardiac chest pain (CP) that eventually die from a cardiovascular event in subsequent years. We compared CCTA to ST to investigate CP. Methods We searched MEDLINE, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase from January 1, 2007 to July 1, 2018 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing CCTA to ST in patients who presented with acute or stable CP. We used Review Manager (RevMan) [Computer program] Version 5.3 (Copenhagen The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2014) for review and analysis. Results We included 16 RCTs enrolling 21,210 patients; there were more patients with hyperlipidemia and older patients in the ST arm compared to the CCTA arm. There was no difference in mortality 103 in the CCTA arm vs. 110 in the ST arm (risk ratio [RR] = 0.93, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.71-1.21, P = .58, and I2 = 0%). A significant reduction was seen in myocardial infarctions (MIs) after CCTA compared to ST 115 vs. 156 (RR = 0.71, CI = 0.56-0.91, P < .006, I2=0%). On subgroup analysis, the CCTA arm had fewer MIs vs. the ST with imaging subgroup (RR = 0.70, CI = 0.54-0.89, P = .004, I2 = 0%) and stable CP subgroup (RR = 0.66, CI = 0.50-0.88, P = .004, I2 = 0%). The CCTA arm showed significantly higher invasive coronary angiograms and revascularizations and significantly reduced follow-up testing and recurrent hospital visits. A trend towards increased unstable anginas was seen in the CCTA arm. Conclusions Our analysis showed a significant reduction in downstream MIs, hospital visits, and follow-up testing when CCTA is used to investigate CAD with no difference in mortality.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: Cureus Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: Cureus Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos