Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Infectious Diseases Society of America Position Paper: Recommended Revisions to the National Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock Early Management Bundle (SEP-1) Sepsis Quality Measure.
Rhee, Chanu; Chiotos, Kathleen; Cosgrove, Sara E; Heil, Emily L; Kadri, Sameer S; Kalil, Andre C; Gilbert, David N; Masur, Henry; Septimus, Edward J; Sweeney, Daniel A; Strich, Jeffrey R; Winslow, Dean L; Klompas, Michael.
Afiliação
  • Rhee C; Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School/Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Chiotos K; Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Cosgrove SE; Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
  • Heil EL; Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
  • Kadri SS; Department of Pharmacy Practice and Science, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
  • Kalil AC; Critical Care Medicine Department, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
  • Gilbert DN; Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Nebraska School of Medicine, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.
  • Masur H; Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
  • Septimus EJ; Critical Care Medicine Department, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
  • Sweeney DA; Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School/Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Strich JR; Department of Internal Medicine, Texas A&M College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Winslow DL; Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego, California, USA.
  • Klompas M; Critical Care Medicine Department, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Clin Infect Dis ; 72(4): 541-552, 2021 02 16.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32374861
ABSTRACT
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services' Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock Early Management Bundle (SEP-1) measure has appropriately established sepsis as a national priority. However, the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA and five additional endorsing societies) is concerned about SEP-1's potential to drive antibiotic overuse because it does not account for the high rate of sepsis overdiagnosis and encourages aggressive antibiotics for all patients with possible sepsis, regardless of the certainty of diagnosis or severity of illness. IDSA is also concerned that SEP-1's complex "time zero" definition is not evidence-based and is prone to inter-observer variation. In this position paper, IDSA outlines several recommendations aimed at reducing the risk of unintended consequences of SEP-1 while maintaining focus on its evidence-based elements. IDSA's core recommendation is to limit SEP-1 to septic shock, for which the evidence supporting the benefit of immediate antibiotics is greatest. Prompt empiric antibiotics are often appropriate for suspected sepsis without shock, but IDSA believes there is too much heterogeneity and difficulty defining this population, uncertainty about the presence of infection, and insufficient data on the necessity of immediate antibiotics to support a mandatory treatment standard for all patients in this category. IDSA believes guidance on managing possible sepsis without shock is more appropriate for guidelines that can delineate the strengths and limitations of supporting evidence and allow clinicians discretion in applying specific recommendations to individual patients. Removing sepsis without shock from SEP-1 will mitigate the risk of unnecessary antibiotic prescribing for noninfectious syndromes, simplify data abstraction, increase measure reliability, and focus attention on the population most likely to benefit from immediate empiric broad-spectrum antibiotics.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Choque Séptico / Doenças Transmissíveis / Sepse Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline Limite: Aged / Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Clin Infect Dis Assunto da revista: DOENCAS TRANSMISSIVEIS Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Choque Séptico / Doenças Transmissíveis / Sepse Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline Limite: Aged / Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Clin Infect Dis Assunto da revista: DOENCAS TRANSMISSIVEIS Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos