Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Delayed breast cancer diagnosis after repeated recall at biennial screening mammography: an observational follow-up study from the Netherlands.
Lameijer, Joost R C; Voogd, Adri C; Pijnappel, Ruud M; Setz-Pels, Wikke; Broeders, Mireille J; Tjan-Heijnen, Vivianne C G; Duijm, Lucien E M.
Afiliação
  • Lameijer JRC; Department of Radiology, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Michelangelolaan 2, 5623 EJ, Eindhoven, The Netherlands. joostlameijer@gmail.com.
  • Voogd AC; Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, GROW, Maastricht University Medical Centre, P Debyelaan 1, 6229 HA, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
  • Pijnappel RM; Department of Epidemiology, GROW, Maastricht University, P Debyelaan 1, 6229 HA, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
  • Setz-Pels W; Department of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization (IKNL), Godebaldkwartier 419, 3511 DT, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Broeders MJ; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Tjan-Heijnen VCG; Dutch Expert Centre for Screening, Wijchenseweg 101, 6538 SW, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • Duijm LEM; Department of Radiology, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Michelangelolaan 2, 5623 EJ, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Br J Cancer ; 123(2): 325-332, 2020 07.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32390006
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Delay in detection of breast cancer may worsen tumour characteristics, with progression of tumour size and a higher risk of metastatic lymph nodes. The purpose of this study was to investigate delayed breast cancer diagnosis after repeated recall for the same mammographic abnormality at screening.

METHODS:

This was a retrospective study performed in two cohorts of women enrolled in a mammography screening programme in the Netherlands. All women aged 50-75 who underwent biennial screening mammography either between January 1, 1997 and December 31, 2006 (cohort 1) or between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2016 (cohort 2) were included.

RESULTS:

The cohorts showed no difference in proportions of women with delayed breast cancer diagnosis of at least 2 years (2.2% versus 2.8%, P = 0.29). Most delays were caused by incorrect BI-RADS classifications after recall (74.2%). An increase in mean tumour size was seen when comparing sizes at initial false-negative recall and at diagnosis of breast cancer (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS:

The proportion of women with a long delay in breast cancer confirmation following repeated recall at screening mammography has not decreased during 20 years of screening. These delays lead to larger tumour size at detection and may negatively influence prognosis.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Prognóstico / Neoplasias da Mama / Detecção Precoce de Câncer Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Br J Cancer Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Prognóstico / Neoplasias da Mama / Detecção Precoce de Câncer Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Br J Cancer Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda