Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Is Gliclazide Associated with a Lower Obesity-Related Cancer Risk Compared to Other Sulfonylureas? A Long-term Prospective Cohort Study.
Du, Jing; Kleefstra, Nanno; Schrijnders, Dennis; Groenier, Klaas H; de Bock, Geertruida H; Landman, Gijs W D.
Afiliação
  • Du J; Department of Epidemiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands. j.du@umcg.nl.
  • Kleefstra N; Langerhans Medical Research Group, Ommen, the Netherlands.
  • Schrijnders D; GGZ Drenthe Mental Health Institute, High and Intensive Care, Assen, the Netherlands.
  • Groenier KH; Department of Internal Medicine, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
  • de Bock GH; Langerhans Medical Research Group, Ommen, the Netherlands.
  • Landman GWD; University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev ; 29(8): 1596-1605, 2020 08.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32404443
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Gliclazide has been suspected to be associated with a lower obesity-related cancer risk; however, current evidence is limited by important methodologic shortcomings. This study aimed to evaluate whether gliclazide is preferred over other sulfonylureas regarding obesity-related cancer risk.

METHODS:

In this prospective cohort study, an annual benchmarking database in Dutch primary care (Zwolle Outpatient Diabetes project Integrating Available CareZODIAC, 1998-2014) was linked to the Netherlands Cancer Registry and the Dutch Personal Record Database. Of the 71,648 patients with type 2 diabetes, we included 26,207 who used sulfonylureas and had no history of cancer or insulin use at baseline. Obesity-related cancer was defined using the latest definition of the World Cancer Research Fund. Cox regression analyses were used to estimate HRs, with both baseline sulfonylurea and cumulative exposure modeled and corrected for baseline covariates.

RESULTS:

During follow-up for 167,692 person-years, there were 1,111 obesity-related cancer events. For males, the adjusted HRs [95% confidence interval (CI)] for baseline sulfonylurea compared with gliclazide were as follows glibenclamide, 1.10 (0.92-2.69); glimepiride, 1.13 (0.68-1.84); and tolbutamide, 0.93 (0.59-1.48). For females, these were as follows glibenclamide, 1.49 (0.72-3.13); glimepiride, 0.96 (0.59-1.54); and tolbutamide, 0.84 (0.54-1.28). The adjusted HRs (95% CI) for one more year of cumulative exposure compared with gliclazide were as follows glibenclamide, 0.90 (0.71-1.14); glimepiride, 0.96 (0.87-1.06); and tolbutamide, 1.00 (0.92-1.09). For females, these were as follows glibenclamide, 0.93 (0.77-1.13); glimepiride, 0.99 (0.90-1.10); and tolbutamide, 1.04 (0.96-1.13).

CONCLUSIONS:

Obesity-related cancer risk was comparable between gliclazide and other sulfonylureas. IMPACT Gliclazide is not preferred over other sulfonylureas regarding obesity-related cancer risk.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Gliclazida / Hipoglicemiantes / Neoplasias / Obesidade Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Assunto da revista: BIOQUIMICA / EPIDEMIOLOGIA / NEOPLASIAS Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Gliclazida / Hipoglicemiantes / Neoplasias / Obesidade Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Assunto da revista: BIOQUIMICA / EPIDEMIOLOGIA / NEOPLASIAS Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda