Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Results of laparoscopic resection in high-risk rectal cancer patients.
Panteleimonitis, Sofoklis; Figueiredo, Nuno; Bhuvanakrishna, Thakshyanee; Harper, Mick; Parvaiz, Amjad.
Afiliação
  • Panteleimonitis S; University of Portsmouth, School of Health and Care Professions, St Andrews Court, St Michael's road, Portsmouth, PO1 2PR, UK. sofoklis_p@hotmail.com.
  • Figueiredo N; Poole Hospital NHS Trust, Longfleet road, Poole, BH15 2JB, UK. sofoklis_p@hotmail.com.
  • Bhuvanakrishna T; Champalimaud Foundation, Av. Brasilia, 1400-038, Lisbon, Portugal.
  • Harper M; Poole Hospital NHS Trust, Longfleet road, Poole, BH15 2JB, UK.
  • Parvaiz A; University of Portsmouth, School of Health and Care Professions, St Andrews Court, St Michael's road, Portsmouth, PO1 2PR, UK.
Langenbecks Arch Surg ; 405(4): 479-490, 2020 Jun.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32472173
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Obesity, neoadjuvant-radiotherapy, tumour proximity to the anal verge and previous abdominal surgery are factors that might increase the intra-operative difficulty of laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery. However, whether patients with these 'high-risk' characteristics are subject to worse short- or long-term outcomes is debated. The aim of this study is to examine the short- and long-term clinical and oncological outcomes of patients receiving laparoscopic rectal surgery with any of these high-risk characteristics and compare them with patients that do not possess any of these high-risk features.

METHODS:

For the purpose of this study data from consecutive patients receiving laparoscopic rectal cancer resections between 2006 and 2016 from two centres were analysed. High-risk patients were defined as patients with either one of the following characteristics BMI ≥ 30, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, tumour < 8 cm from the anal verge and previous abdominal surgery.

RESULTS:

A total of 313 patients were identified (227 high risk, 86 low risk). Short-term outcomes were similar between the two groups with the exception of blood loss and length of stay, which were higher in the high-risk group (10 vs 2.5 ml, p = 0.045; 7 vs 5 days, p = 0.001). There were no statistically significant differences in 5-year overall survival (79.7% vs 79.8%, p = 0.757), disease-free survival (76.8% vs 69.3%, p = 0.175), distant disease-free interval (84.8% vs 79.7%, p = 0.231) and local recurrence-free interval (100%, 97.4%, p = 0.162) between the two groups.

CONCLUSION:

Similar short- and long-term outcomes can be achieved in high-risk and low-risk patients receiving laparoscopic rectal surgery. The presented data support the suitability of laparoscopic surgery for this group of patients.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Complicações Pós-Operatórias / Neoplasias Retais / Laparoscopia / Obesidade Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Langenbecks Arch Surg Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Complicações Pós-Operatórias / Neoplasias Retais / Laparoscopia / Obesidade Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Langenbecks Arch Surg Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido