Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Global human influence maps reveal clear opportunities in conserving Earth's remaining intact terrestrial ecosystems.
Riggio, Jason; Baillie, Jonathan E M; Brumby, Steven; Ellis, Erle; Kennedy, Christina M; Oakleaf, James R; Tait, Alex; Tepe, Therese; Theobald, David M; Venter, Oscar; Watson, James E M; Jacobson, Andrew P.
Afiliação
  • Riggio J; National Geographic Society, Washington, DC, USA.
  • Baillie JEM; Department of Wildlife, Fish and Conservation Biology, Museum of Wildlife and Fish Biology, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA.
  • Brumby S; National Geographic Society, Washington, DC, USA.
  • Ellis E; National Geographic Society, Washington, DC, USA.
  • Kennedy CM; Department of Geography and Environmental Systems, University of Maryland, Baltimore County, MD, USA.
  • Oakleaf JR; Global Lands Program, The Nature Conservancy, Fort Collins, CO, USA.
  • Tait A; Global Lands Program, The Nature Conservancy, Fort Collins, CO, USA.
  • Tepe T; National Geographic Society, Washington, DC, USA.
  • Theobald DM; National Geographic Society, Washington, DC, USA.
  • Venter O; Conservation Planning Technologies, Fort Collins, CO, USA.
  • Watson JEM; Natural Resource and Environmental Studies Institute, University of Northern British Columbia, Prince George, BC, Canada.
  • Jacobson AP; School of Earth and Environmental Science, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Qld, Australia.
Glob Chang Biol ; 26(8): 4344-4356, 2020 08.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32500604
ABSTRACT
Leading up to the Convention on Biological Diversity Conference of the Parties 15, there is momentum around setting bold conservation targets. Yet, it remains unclear how much of Earth's land area remains without significant human influence and where this land is located. We compare four recent global maps of human influences across Earth's land, Anthromes, Global Human Modification, Human Footprint and Low Impact Areas, to answer these questions. Despite using various methodologies and data, these different spatial assessments independently estimate similar percentages of the Earth's terrestrial surface as having very low (20%-34%) and low (48%-56%) human influence. Three out of four spatial assessments agree on 46% of the non-permanent ice- or snow-covered land as having low human influence. However, much of the very low and low influence portions of the planet are comprised of cold (e.g., boreal forests, montane grasslands and tundra) or arid (e.g., deserts) landscapes. Only four biomes (boreal forests, deserts, temperate coniferous forests and tundra) have a majority of datasets agreeing that at least half of their area has very low human influence. More concerning, <1% of temperate grasslands, tropical coniferous forests and tropical dry forests have very low human influence across most datasets, and tropical grasslands, mangroves and montane grasslands also have <1% of land identified as very low influence across all datasets. These findings suggest that about half of Earth's terrestrial surface has relatively low human influence and offers opportunities for proactive conservation actions to retain the last intact ecosystems on the planet. However, though the relative abundance of ecosystem areas with low human influence varies widely by biome, conserving these last intact areas should be a high priority before they are completely lost.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ecossistema / Conservação dos Recursos Naturais Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Glob Chang Biol Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ecossistema / Conservação dos Recursos Naturais Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Glob Chang Biol Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos