Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Real world data regarding the management of cancer-associated thrombosis.
Tsoukalas, Nikolaos; Tsapakidis, Konstantinos; Galanopoulos, Michail; Karamitrousis, Evangelos; Kamposioras, Konstantinos; Tolia, Maria.
Afiliação
  • Tsoukalas N; Department of Oncology, 401 Military Hospital of Athens, Athens.
  • Tsapakidis K; Department of Oncology, Medical School, University of Thessaly, Larisa.
  • Galanopoulos M; Department of Gastroenterology, 401 Military Hospital of Athens, Athens.
  • Karamitrousis E; Department of Medical Oncology, University General Hospital of Alexandroupolis, Alexandroupolis, Greece.
  • Kamposioras K; Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
  • Tolia M; Department of Radiotherapy-Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Thessaly, Larisa, Greece.
Curr Opin Oncol ; 32(4): 289-294, 2020 07.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32541315
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Patients with cancer are at high risk for thrombotic events, mainly deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. Low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are among the current treatment options for cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT). We assessed real world data (RWD) regarding treatment patterns of CAT from 1 September 2018 to 31 January 2020. RECENT FINDINGS: RWD showed that LMWHs were the most common initial anticoagulation treatment for CAT. Based on these data DOACs had a lower risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism compared with LMWHs and warfarin. However, the selection bias and the small number of patients in these studies might explain this difference and these limitations should be taken into consideration. Moreover, there was no statistical difference regarding adverse events during anticoagulant treatment between LMWHs and DOACs with the limitations of RWD. As far as the duration of the treatment is concerned, the adherence ranged from 100% to 67.3% at 6 months. SUMMARY: The current review of RWD illustrates that LMWHs and DOACs are used for the treatment of CAT. LMWHs are most commonly used for the initial management of CAT. Data regarding recurrence of CAT, adverse events, compliance and duration of anticoagulant treatment should be analyzed with caution as RWD are observational studies with many limitations. Further research is needed to elucidate the best algorithm for the management of CAT.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Embolia Pulmonar / Tromboembolia Venosa / Neoplasias Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Curr Opin Oncol Assunto da revista: NEOPLASIAS Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Embolia Pulmonar / Tromboembolia Venosa / Neoplasias Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Curr Opin Oncol Assunto da revista: NEOPLASIAS Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article