Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
What delays your case start? Exploring operating room inefficiencies.
Athanasiadis, Dimitrios I; Monfared, Sara; Whiteside, Jake; Banerjee, Ambar; Keller, Donna; Butler, Annabelle; Stefanidis, Dimitrios.
Afiliação
  • Athanasiadis DI; Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, 545 Barnhill Dr., EH 130, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.
  • Monfared S; Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, 545 Barnhill Dr., EH 130, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.
  • Whiteside J; Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
  • Banerjee A; Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, 545 Barnhill Dr., EH 130, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.
  • Keller D; Indiana University Health North Hospital, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
  • Butler A; Indiana University Health North Hospital, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
  • Stefanidis D; Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, 545 Barnhill Dr., EH 130, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.
Surg Endosc ; 35(6): 2709-2714, 2021 06.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32556760
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Improving operating room (OR) inefficiencies benefits the OR team, hospital, and patients alike but the available literature is limited. Our goal was, using a novel surgical application, to identify any OR incidents that cause delays from the time the patient enters the OR till procedure start (preparatory phase). MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

We conducted an IRB approved, prospective, observational study between July 2018 and January 2019. Using a novel surgical application (ExplORer Surgical) three observers recorded disrupting incidents and their duration during the preparatory phase of a variety of general surgery cases. Specifically, the number and duration of anesthesia delays, unnecessary/distracting conversations, missing items, and other delays were recorded from the moment they started until they stopped affecting the normal workflow.

RESULTS:

Ninety-six OR cases were assessed. 20 incidents occurred in 18 (19%) of those cases. The average preparatory duration for all the cases was 20.7 ± 8.6 min. Cases without incidents lasted 19.5 ± 7.4 min while cases with incidents lasted 25.9 ± 11.2 min, p = 0.03. The average incident lasted 3.7 min, approximately 18% of the preparatory phase duration.

CONCLUSION:

The use of the ExplORer Surgical app allowed us to accurately record the incidents happening during the preparatory phase of various general surgery operations. Such incidents significantly prolonged the preparatory duration. The identification of those inefficiencies is the first step to targeted interventions that may eventually optimize the efficiency of preoperative preparation.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Salas Cirúrgicas / Anestesia Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Surg Endosc Assunto da revista: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM / GASTROENTEROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Salas Cirúrgicas / Anestesia Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Surg Endosc Assunto da revista: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM / GASTROENTEROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos