Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
High-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure in 22 dogs requiring oxygen support escalation.
Jagodich, Tiffany A; Bersenas, Alexa M E; Bateman, Shane W; Kerr, Carolyn L.
Afiliação
  • Jagodich TA; Department of Clinical Sciences, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
  • Bersenas AME; Department of Clinical Sciences, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
  • Bateman SW; Department of Clinical Sciences, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
  • Kerr CL; Department of Clinical Sciences, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio) ; 30(4): 364-375, 2020 Jul.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32583614
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To determine the effect of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) oxygen therapy on cardiorespiratory variables and outcome in dogs with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure.

DESIGN:

Prospective, sequential clinical trial.

SETTING:

University veterinary teaching hospital. ANIMALS Twenty-two client-owned dogs that failed to respond to traditional oxygen support.

INTERVENTIONS:

Initiation of HFNC therapy after traditional oxygen supplementation failed to increase Spo2 > 96% and Pao2 > 75 mm Hg or improve respiratory rate/effort. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

RESULTS:

Physiological variables, blood gas analyses, and dyspnea/sedation/tolerance scores were collected prior to HFNC initiation (on traditional oxygen support [time 0 or T0]), and subsequently during HFNC oxygen administration at time 30 minutes, 60 minutes, and 7 ± 1 hours. Relative to T0, use of HFNC resulted in a decreased respiratory rate at 1 hour (P = 0.022) and 7 hours (P = 0.012), a decrease in dyspnea score at all times (P < 0.01), and an increase in Spo2 at all times (P < 0.01). There was no difference in arterial/venous Pco2 relative to T0, although Paco2 was correlated with flow rate. Based on respiratory assessment, 60% of dogs responded to HFNC use by 30 minutes, and 45% ultimately responded to HFNC use and survived. No clinical air-leak syndromes were observed.

CONCLUSIONS:

HFNC use improved oxygenation and work of breathing relative to traditional oxygen therapies, without impairing ventilation. HFNC use appears to be a beneficial oxygen support modality to bridge the gap between standard oxygen supplementation and mechanical ventilation.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Oxigênio / Oxigenoterapia / Insuficiência Respiratória / Doenças do Cão / Hipóxia Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Limite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio) Assunto da revista: MEDICINA DE EMERGENCIA / MEDICINA VETERINARIA / TERAPIA INTENSIVA Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Canadá

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Oxigênio / Oxigenoterapia / Insuficiência Respiratória / Doenças do Cão / Hipóxia Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Limite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio) Assunto da revista: MEDICINA DE EMERGENCIA / MEDICINA VETERINARIA / TERAPIA INTENSIVA Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Canadá