Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Proving the Effectiveness of the Fundamentals of Robotic Surgery (FRS) Skills Curriculum: A Single-blinded, Multispecialty, Multi-institutional Randomized Control Trial.
Satava, Richard M; Stefanidis, Dimitrios; Levy, Jeffrey S; Smith, Roger; Martin, John R; Monfared, Sara; Timsina, Lava R; Darzi, Ara Wardkes; Moglia, Andrea; Brand, Timothy C; Dorin, Ryan P; Dumon, Kristoffel R; Francone, Todd D; Georgiou, Evangelos; Goh, Alvin C; Marcet, Jorge E; Martino, Martin A; Sudan, Ranjan; Vale, Justin; Gallagher, Anthony G.
Afiliação
  • Satava RM; Department of Surgery, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA.
  • Stefanidis D; Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN.
  • Levy JS; Department of Ob/Gyn, Drexel University College of Medicine, Institute of Surgical Excellence, Philadelphia, PA.
  • Smith R; Florida Hospital Nicholson Center, University of Central Florida College of Medicine, Celebration, FL.
  • Martin JR; Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN.
  • Monfared S; Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN.
  • Timsina LR; Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN.
  • Darzi AW; Department of Surgery, St. Mary's Hospital, Imperial College, London, UK.
  • Moglia A; EndoCAS Simulation Center, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
  • Brand TC; Andersen Simulation Center, Madigan Army Medical Center, Tacoma, WA.
  • Dorin RP; Center for Education, Simulation and Innovation, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT.
  • Dumon KR; Penn Medicine Clinical Simulation Center, Philadelphia, PA.
  • Francone TD; Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Lahey Health and Medical Center, Burlington, MA.
  • Georgiou E; National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
  • Goh AC; Houston Methodist Hospital, Methodist Institute for Technology, Innovation, and Education, Houston, TX.
  • Marcet JE; USF Health Center for Advanced Medical Learning and Simulation, Tampa, FL.
  • Martino MA; Lehigh Valley Health Network, Allentown, PA.
  • Sudan R; Department of Surgery, Surgical Education and Activities Lab, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.
  • Vale J; EndoCAS Simulation Center, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
  • Gallagher AG; Technology Enhanced Learning, ASSERT Centre, College of Medicine and Health, Brookfield Health Sciences Complex, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Ann Surg ; 272(2): 384-392, 2020 08.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32675553
OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the noninferiority of the fundamentals of robotic surgery (FRS) skills curriculum over current training paradigms and identify an ideal training platform. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: There is currently no validated, uniformly accepted curriculum for training in robotic surgery skills. METHODS: Single-blinded parallel-group randomized trial at 12 international American College of Surgeons (ACS) Accredited Education Institutes (AEI). Thirty-three robotic surgery experts and 123 inexperienced surgical trainees were enrolled between April 2015 and November 2016. Benchmarks (proficiency levels) on the 7 FRS Dome tasks were established based on expert performance. Participants were then randomly assigned to 4 training groups: Dome (n = 29), dV-Trainer (n = 30), and DVSS (n = 32) that trained to benchmarks and control (n = 32) that trained using locally available robotic skills curricula. The primary outcome was participant performance after training based on task errors and duration on 5 basic robotic tasks (knot tying, continuous suturing, cutting, dissection, and vessel coagulation) using an avian tissue model (transfer-test). Secondary outcomes included cognitive test scores, GEARS ratings, and robot familiarity checklist scores. RESULTS: All groups demonstrated significant performance improvement after skills training (P < 0.01). Participating residents and fellows performed tasks faster (DOME and DVSS groups) and with fewer errors than controls (DOME group; P < 0.01). Inter-rater reliability was high for the checklist scores (0.82-0.97) but moderate for GEARS ratings (0.40-0.67). CONCLUSIONS: We provide evidence of effectiveness for the FRS curriculum by demonstrating better performance of those trained following FRS compared with controls on a transfer test. We therefore argue for its implementation across training programs before surgeons apply these skills clinically.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Especialidades Cirúrgicas / Simulação por Computador / Competência Clínica / Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos / Treinamento por Simulação Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Ann Surg Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Especialidades Cirúrgicas / Simulação por Computador / Competência Clínica / Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos / Treinamento por Simulação Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Ann Surg Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article