Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Cowitness identification speed affects choices from target-absent photospreads.
Douglass, Amy Bradfield; Lucas, Carmen A; Brewer, Neil.
Afiliação
  • Douglass AB; Department of Psychology, Bates College.
  • Lucas CA; College of Education, Psychology, and Social Work, Flinders Universiyt.
  • Brewer N; College of Education, Psychology, and Social Work, Flinders University.
Law Hum Behav ; 44(6): 474-484, 2020 12.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32757573
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Three studies examined the influence of a witness's identification speed on the identification decision of another witness. HYPOTHESES Based on research documenting cowitness effects we expected cowitness speed to affect identification decisions from target-absent photospreads. Without prior research testing the effects of cowitness speed, we did not have a specific prediction regarding how fast (vs. slow) cowitness identification decisions would affect participant-witnesses' identification rates in Study 1. Based on the results from Study 1, in Study 2 we predicted that fast (vs. slow) cowitness decisions would increase choices from target-absent photospreads when the cowitness was known to have made a positive identification. In Study 3, cowitnesses rejected the photospread. Based on the previous studies, we hypothesized that fast (vs. slow) cowitness decisions would decrease choices from target-absent photospreads. However, because a photospread rejection is qualitatively different from an identification, this prediction was tentative.

METHOD:

In all three studies, participants watched one of 2 stimulus videos with a confederate cowitness. After the video, the confederate made a fast (10 s) or slow (4 min) identification. Participants then attempted an identification from a target-absent photospread. In Study 1 (N = 101), the confederate's decision from the photospread was ambiguous. In Study 2 (N = 200) the confederate announced making a positive identification. In Study 3 (N = 151) the confederate cowitness rejected the photospread.

RESULTS:

In all 3 studies, participants paired with a fast cowitness made more choices from the target-absent photospread than did participants paired with a slow cowitness.

CONCLUSIONS:

Fast cowitness identifications increased choices from the target-absent photospread regardless of whether a cowitness's decision was ambiguous (Study 1), whether they made an identification (Study 2), or rejected the photospread (Study 3). Given the effects of cowitness speed on identification decisions, it might be advisable to standardize the duration of identification procedures and inform witnesses of this standardization. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Tempo de Reação / Fotografação / Reconhecimento de Identidade Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Law Hum Behav Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Tempo de Reação / Fotografação / Reconhecimento de Identidade Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Law Hum Behav Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article