Subjective and objective assessments after a change from a 4-crew, 12-h shift to a 3-crew, 12-h shift schedule: an observational study.

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To clarify the subjective and objective impacts of a change in a 12-h shift schedule, involving a reduction in the number of crews, on workers at an electronic parts production company. METHODS: Forty-two workers participated in this study. Subjective indicators (e.g. questionnaires) and objective indicators [e.g., psychomotor vigilance task (PVT)], as well as an activity monitor-based sleep assessment, were measured during a > 1-year period that encompassed the shift schedule change. The study outcome was a comparison of work-related injury rates measured 1 year before and after the change in shift schedule. RESULTS: After the shift schedule change, questionnaire scores regarding work-related burdens and PVT performance parameters, including mean response time and number of lapses, increased significantly. However, we also observed divergences in the trends of the subjective and objective measures 1 year after the change. Despite these variations in both types of measures, we observed no significant differences in work-related injury rates measured before and after the shift schedule change. CONCLUSION: This study revealed that a reduction in the number of crews in a 12-h shift schedule has a negative impact on the subjective and objective indicator after the change in shift schedule; only indicators of alertness did not recover at 1 year after the change. Assessments of the workers' performances and the regular implementation of health and safety programs for more than 1 year are needed to maintain workers' health after the change in shift schedule.