Young adult e-cigarette use: A latent class analysis of device and flavor use, 2018-2019.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The myriad of e-cigarette devices and flavors used by young adults (YAs) complicates identification of the particular e-cigarette products that are associated with more frequent tobacco use and merit consideration for regulation. The current study used latent class analysis to identify distinct patterns of e-cigarette device and flavor use and evaluate their association with vaping and smoking frequency. METHODS: Cross-sectional survey data (2018-2019) from a Southern California cohort were analyzed. YAs reporting past 30-day nicotine vaping (N = 550; M age = 19.2 years) self-reported e-cigarette device type/brand and flavor. Six device (e-cig/vape pen, mech mod, box mod, JUUL, non-JUUL pod, disposable) and three flavor (tobacco, mint/menthol, sweet/fruit) indicators were included in a latent class analysis. Past 30-day nicotine vaping and cigarette smoking frequency were assessed as correlates of device and flavor class membership. RESULTS: Three classes were identified Any Pod-Mint/Menthol or Sweet/Fruit Flavor Users (prevalance47%); Non-JUUL-Sweet/Fruit Flavor Users (28%); and Poly-Device-Poly-Flavor Users (25%). Greater frequency of vaping and smoking were associated with higher odds of belonging to the Poly-Device-Poly-Flavor Users class vs. the Any Pod-Mint/Menthol or Sweet/Fruit Flavor Users (vaping aOR[95%CI] = 1.36[1.16, 1.59], p < .001; smoking aOR[95%CI] = 1.25[1.02, 1.54], p = .03) and Non-JUUL-Sweet/Fruit Flavor Users (vaping aOR[95%CI] = 1.30[1.10, 1.53], p < .01; smoking aOR[95%CI] = 1.42[1.07, 1.88], p = .02) classes. CONCLUSIONS: Although YAs that predominately used pod devices alongside non-tobacco flavors were most common, YAs characterized by a proclivity toward using many different devices and flavors were appreciably prevalent and smoked and vaped more frequently. Regulations targeting a wide spectrum of vaping products may be optimal in protecting YA health.