Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Predictors of increase in pacing threshold after transcatheter pacing system implantation due to micro-dislodgement.
Higuchi, Motoaki; Shinoda, Yasutoshi; Hasegawa, Tomoaki; Ishibashi, Mayu; Yamada, Norihiro; Chiba, Yoshiro; Ohira, Koji; Murata, Minoru; Aonuma, Kazutaka.
Afiliação
  • Higuchi M; Department of Cardiology, Mito Saiseikai General Hospital, Mito, Japan.
  • Shinoda Y; Department of Cardiology, Mito Saiseikai General Hospital, Mito, Japan.
  • Hasegawa T; Department of Cardiology, Mito Saiseikai General Hospital, Mito, Japan.
  • Ishibashi M; Department of Cardiology, Mito Saiseikai General Hospital, Mito, Japan.
  • Yamada N; Department of Cardiology, Mito Saiseikai General Hospital, Mito, Japan.
  • Chiba Y; Department of Cardiology, Mito Saiseikai General Hospital, Mito, Japan.
  • Ohira K; Department of Cardiology, Mito Saiseikai General Hospital, Mito, Japan.
  • Murata M; Department of Cardiology, Mito Saiseikai General Hospital, Mito, Japan.
  • Aonuma K; Department of Cardiology, Mito Saiseikai General Hospital, Mito, Japan.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol ; 43(11): 1351-1357, 2020 11.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32969504
BACKGROUND: Achieving a favorable pacing threshold with a Micra transcatheter pacing system (Micra-TPS) is needed to reduce battery depletion. In some cases, the threshold increases shortly after the device is implanted, and a higher pacing threshold may be required. This study aims to identify the causes and predictors of the increase in pacing threshold observed shortly after Micra-TPS implantation. METHODS: The study included 64 consecutive patients who underwent Micra-TPS implantation between 2017 and 2020. The patients were divided into two groups depending on their pacing threshold: the increased pacing threshold (IPT) group (threshold increased by ≥0.5 V/0.24 ms within 1 month of implantation) and the stable pacing threshold (SPT) group. RESULTS: Excluding four patients who could not be followed up, of the 60 remaining patients, nine (15%) were in the IPT group and 51 (85%) were in the SPT group. The IPT group had significantly lower implant impedance values and higher implant thresholds than the SPT group (582 ± 59 vs 755 ± 167 Ω [P < .001] and 1.29 ± 0.87 vs 0.71 ± 0.40 V/0.24 ms [P = .014]). Implant impedance and threshold may serve as predictors of a threshold increase after implantation (area under the curve: 0.737-0.943 and 0.586-0.926, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: An IPT was noted shortly after Micra-TPS implantation owing to micro-dislodgement because of insufficient anchoring of the device to the myocardium. Impedance >660 Ω and threshold <1.0 V/0.24 ms may predict an increase in pacing threshold.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Marca-Passo Artificial / Arritmias Cardíacas / Estimulação Cardíaca Artificial Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Pacing Clin Electrophysiol Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Japão

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Marca-Passo Artificial / Arritmias Cardíacas / Estimulação Cardíaca Artificial Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Pacing Clin Electrophysiol Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Japão