Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluating the efficacy of treatment options for anal intraepithelial neoplasia: a systematic review.
Brogden, Danielle R L; Walsh, Una; Pellino, Gianluca; Kontovounisios, Christos; Tekkis, Paris; Mills, Sarah C.
Afiliação
  • Brogden DRL; Chelsea and Westminster Hospitals, NHS Foundation Trust and Imperial College, London, UK.
  • Walsh U; Chelsea and Westminster Hospitals, NHS Foundation Trust and Imperial College, London, UK.
  • Pellino G; Colorectal Surgery, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Kontovounisios C; Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy.
  • Tekkis P; Chelsea and Westminster Hospitals, NHS Foundation Trust and Imperial College, London, UK. c.konotovounisios@imperial.ac.uk.
  • Mills SC; Chelsea and Westminster Hospitals, NHS Foundation Trust and Imperial College, London, UK.
Int J Colorectal Dis ; 36(2): 213-226, 2021 Feb.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32979069
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Anal intraepithelial neoplasia (AIN) is the accepted precursor of anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC). There has long been a hypothesis that treating AIN may prevent ASCC. Many different treatment modalities have been suggested and studied. We conducted this systematic review to evaluate their efficacy and the evidence as to whether we can prevent ASCC by treating AIN.

METHODS:

MEDLINE and EMBASE were electronically searched using relevant search terms. All studies investigating the use of a single treatment for AIN that reported at least one end outcome such as partial or complete response to treatment, recurrence after treatment and/or ASCC diagnosis after treatment were included.

RESULTS:

Thirty studies were included in the systematic review investigating 10 treatment modalities 5% imiquimod, 5-fluorouracil, cidofovir, trichloroacetic acid, electrocautery, surgical excision, infrared coagulation, radiofrequency ablation, photodynamic therapy and HPV vaccination. All treatment modalities demonstrated some initial regression of AIN after treatment; however, recurrence rates were high especially in HIV-positive patients. Many of the studies suffered from significant bias which prevented direct comparison.

CONCLUSIONS:

Although the theory persists that by inducing the regression of AIN, we may be able to reduce the risk of ASCC, there was no clinical evidence within the literature advocating that treating AIN does prevent ASCC.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias do Ânus / Carcinoma in Situ / Carcinoma de Células Escamosas / Infecções por HIV / Infecções por Papillomavirus Tipo de estudo: Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Int J Colorectal Dis Assunto da revista: GASTROENTEROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias do Ânus / Carcinoma in Situ / Carcinoma de Células Escamosas / Infecções por HIV / Infecções por Papillomavirus Tipo de estudo: Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Int J Colorectal Dis Assunto da revista: GASTROENTEROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido