Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Abnormal Uterine Bleeding.
Robbins, Jessica B; Sadowski, Elizabeth A; Maturen, Katherine E; Akin, Esma A; Ascher, Susan M; Brook, Olga R; Cassella, Courtney R; Dassel, Mark; Henrichsen, Tara L; Learman, Lee A; Patlas, Michael N; Saphier, Carl; Wasnik, Ashish P; Glanc, Phyllis.
Afiliação
  • Robbins JB; Panel Vice-Chair, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin. Electronic address: jrobbins@uwhealth.org.
  • Sadowski EA; University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin.
  • Maturen KE; Panel Chair, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
  • Akin EA; George Washington University Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia.
  • Ascher SM; Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia.
  • Brook OR; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Cassella CR; Reading Hospital, Reading, Pennsylvania; American College of Emergency Physicians.
  • Dassel M; Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio; American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.
  • Henrichsen TL; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
  • Learman LA; Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, Roanoke, Virginia; American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.
  • Patlas MN; McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
  • Saphier C; Women's Ultrasound, LLC, Englewood, New Jersey; American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.
  • Wasnik AP; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
  • Glanc P; Specialty Chair, University of Toronto and Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
J Am Coll Radiol ; 17(11S): S336-S345, 2020 Nov.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33153547
ABSTRACT
This publication summarizes the relevant literature for the imaging of patients with symptoms of abnormal uterine bleeding, including initial imaging, follow-up imaging when the original ultrasound is inconclusive, and follow-up imaging when surveillance is appropriate. For patients with abnormal uterine bleeding, combined transabdominal and transvaginal ultrasound of the pelvis with Doppler is the most appropriate initial imaging study. If the uterus is incompletely visualized with the initial ultrasou2nd, MRI of the pelvis without and with contrast is the next appropriate imaging study, unless a polyp is suspected on the original ultrasound, then sonohysterography can be performed. If the patient continues to experience abnormal uterine bleeding, assessment with ultrasound of the pelvis, sonohysterography, and MRI of the pelvis without and with contrast would be appropriate. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Sociedades Médicas / Medicina Baseada em Evidências Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline Limite: Female / Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: J Am Coll Radiol Assunto da revista: RADIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Sociedades Médicas / Medicina Baseada em Evidências Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline Limite: Female / Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: J Am Coll Radiol Assunto da revista: RADIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article