Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Implementing gene curation for hereditary cancer susceptibility in Australia: achieving consensus on genes with clinical utility.
Tudini, Emma; Davidson, Aimee L; Dressel, Uwe; Andrews, Lesley; Antill, Yoland; Crook, Ashley; Field, Michael; Gattas, Michael; Harris, Rebecca; Kirk, Judy; Pachter, Nicholas; Salmon, Lucinda; Susman, Rachel; Townshend, Sharron; Trainer, Alison H; Tucker, Katherine M; Mitchell, Gillian; James, Paul A; Ward, Robyn L; Mar Fan, Helen; Poplawski, Nicola K; Spurdle, Amanda B.
Afiliação
  • Tudini E; Department of Genetics and Computational Biology, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
  • Davidson AL; Australian Genomics Health Alliance, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Dressel U; Department of Genetics and Computational Biology, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
  • Andrews L; Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
  • Antill Y; Australian Genomics Health Alliance, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Crook A; Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
  • Field M; Hereditary Cancer Clinic, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Gattas M; Prince of Wales Medical School, University of New South Wales, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Harris R; Cabrini Family Cancer Clinic, Cabrini Hospital, Malvern, Victoria, Australia.
  • Kirk J; Familial Cancer Service, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Pachter N; Familial Cancer Service, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Salmon L; Brisbane Genetics, Nicholson St Specialist Centre, Greenslopes, Queensland, Australia.
  • Susman R; Familial Cancer Service, Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Townshend S; Familial Cancer Service, Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Trainer AH; Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Centre for Cancer Research, Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Tucker KM; Genetic Services of Western Australia, King Edward Memorial Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
  • Mitchell G; Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
  • James PA; Department of Clinical Genetics, Austin Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Ward RL; Genetic Health Queensland, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
  • Mar Fan H; Genetic Services of Western Australia, King Edward Memorial Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
  • Poplawski NK; Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Spurdle AB; Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
J Med Genet ; 58(12): 853-858, 2021 12.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33168572
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The strength of evidence supporting the validity of gene-disease relationships is variable. Hereditary cancer has the additional complexity of low or moderate penetrance for some confirmed disease-associated alleles.

METHODS:

To promote national consistency in interpretation of hereditary cancer/tumour gene test results, we requested opinions of representatives from Australian Family Cancer Clinics regarding the clinical utility of 157 genes initially collated for a national research project. Viewpoints were sought by initial survey, face-to-face workshop and follow-up survey. Subsequent review was undertaken by the eviQ Cancer Genetics Reference Committee, a national resource providing evidence-based and consensus-driven cancer treatment protocols.

RESULTS:

Genes were categorised by clinical actionability as relevant for testing on presentation of common cancer/tumour types (n=45); relevant for testing in the context of specific rare phenotypes (n=74); insufficient clinical utility (n=34) or contentious clinical utility (n=3). Opinions for several genes altered during the study time frame, due to new information.

CONCLUSION:

Through an iterative process, consensus was achieved on genes with clinical utility for hereditary cancer/tumour conditions in the Australian setting. This study highlighted need for regular review of gene-disease lists, a role assumed in Australia for hereditary cancer/tumour predisposition genes by the eviQ Cancer Genetics Reference Committee.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Testes Genéticos / Predisposição Genética para Doença / Anotação de Sequência Molecular / Aconselhamento Genético / Neoplasias Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Female / Humans / Male País/Região como assunto: Oceania Idioma: En Revista: J Med Genet Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Austrália

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Testes Genéticos / Predisposição Genética para Doença / Anotação de Sequência Molecular / Aconselhamento Genético / Neoplasias Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Female / Humans / Male País/Região como assunto: Oceania Idioma: En Revista: J Med Genet Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Austrália