Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A Deep Learning-Based Automated CT Segmentation of Prostate Cancer Anatomy for Radiation Therapy Planning-A Retrospective Multicenter Study.
Kiljunen, Timo; Akram, Saad; Niemelä, Jarkko; Löyttyniemi, Eliisa; Seppälä, Jan; Heikkilä, Janne; Vuolukka, Kristiina; Kääriäinen, Okko-Sakari; Heikkilä, Vesa-Pekka; Lehtiö, Kaisa; Nikkinen, Juha; Gershkevitsh, Eduard; Borkvel, Anni; Adamson, Merve; Zolotuhhin, Daniil; Kolk, Kati; Pang, Eric Pei Ping; Tuan, Jeffrey Kit Loong; Master, Zubin; Chua, Melvin Lee Kiang; Joensuu, Timo; Kononen, Juha; Myllykangas, Mikko; Riener, Maigo; Mokka, Miia; Keyriläinen, Jani.
Afiliação
  • Kiljunen T; Docrates Cancer Center, Saukonpaadenranta 2, FI-00180 Helsinki, Finland.
  • Akram S; MVision Ai, c/o Terkko Health hub, Haartmaninkatu 4, FI-00290 Helsinki, Finland.
  • Niemelä J; MVision Ai, c/o Terkko Health hub, Haartmaninkatu 4, FI-00290 Helsinki, Finland.
  • Löyttyniemi E; Department of Biostatistics, University of Turku, Kiinamyllynkatu 10, FI-20014 Turku, Finland.
  • Seppälä J; Kuopio University Hospital, Center of Oncology, Kelkkailijantie 7, FI-70210 Kuopio, Finland.
  • Heikkilä J; Kuopio University Hospital, Center of Oncology, Kelkkailijantie 7, FI-70210 Kuopio, Finland.
  • Vuolukka K; Kuopio University Hospital, Center of Oncology, Kelkkailijantie 7, FI-70210 Kuopio, Finland.
  • Kääriäinen OS; Kuopio University Hospital, Center of Oncology, Kelkkailijantie 7, FI-70210 Kuopio, Finland.
  • Heikkilä VP; Oulu University Hospital, Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Kajaanintie 50, FI-90220 Oulu, Finland.
  • Lehtiö K; University of Oulu, Research Unit of Medical Imaging, Physics and Technology, Aapistie 5 A, FI-90220 Oulu, Finland.
  • Nikkinen J; Oulu University Hospital, Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Kajaanintie 50, FI-90220 Oulu, Finland.
  • Gershkevitsh E; Oulu University Hospital, Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Kajaanintie 50, FI-90220 Oulu, Finland.
  • Borkvel A; University of Oulu, Research Unit of Medical Imaging, Physics and Technology, Aapistie 5 A, FI-90220 Oulu, Finland.
  • Adamson M; North Estonia Medical Centre, J. Sütiste tee 19, 13419 Tallinn, Estonia.
  • Zolotuhhin D; North Estonia Medical Centre, J. Sütiste tee 19, 13419 Tallinn, Estonia.
  • Kolk K; North Estonia Medical Centre, J. Sütiste tee 19, 13419 Tallinn, Estonia.
  • Pang EPP; North Estonia Medical Centre, J. Sütiste tee 19, 13419 Tallinn, Estonia.
  • Tuan JKL; North Estonia Medical Centre, J. Sütiste tee 19, 13419 Tallinn, Estonia.
  • Master Z; National Cancer Centre Singapore, Division of Radiation Oncology, 11 Hospital Crescent, Singapore 169610, Singapore.
  • Chua MLK; National Cancer Centre Singapore, Division of Radiation Oncology, 11 Hospital Crescent, Singapore 169610, Singapore.
  • Joensuu T; Oncology Academic Programme, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore 169857, Singapore.
  • Kononen J; National Cancer Centre Singapore, Division of Radiation Oncology, 11 Hospital Crescent, Singapore 169610, Singapore.
  • Myllykangas M; National Cancer Centre Singapore, Division of Radiation Oncology, 11 Hospital Crescent, Singapore 169610, Singapore.
  • Riener M; Oncology Academic Programme, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore 169857, Singapore.
  • Mokka M; National Cancer Centre Singapore, Division of Medical Sciences, Singapore 169610, Singapore.
  • Keyriläinen J; Docrates Cancer Center, Saukonpaadenranta 2, FI-00180 Helsinki, Finland.
Diagnostics (Basel) ; 10(11)2020 Nov 17.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33212793
ABSTRACT
A commercial deep learning (DL)-based automated segmentation tool (AST) for computed tomography (CT) is evaluated for accuracy and efficiency gain within prostate cancer patients. Thirty patients from six clinics were reviewed with manual- (MC), automated- (AC) and automated and edited (AEC) contouring methods. In the AEC group, created contours (prostate, seminal vesicles, bladder, rectum, femoral heads and penile bulb) were edited, whereas the MC group included empty datasets for MC. In one clinic, lymph node CTV delineations were evaluated for interobserver variability. Compared to MC, the mean time saved using the AST was 12 min for the whole data set (46%) and 12 min for the lymph node CTV (60%), respectively. The delineation consistency between MC and AEC groups according to the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) improved from 0.78 to 0.94 for the whole data set and from 0.76 to 0.91 for the lymph nodes. The mean DSCs between MC and AC for all six clinics were 0.82 for prostate, 0.72 for seminal vesicles, 0.93 for bladder, 0.84 for rectum, 0.69 for femoral heads and 0.51 for penile bulb. This study proves that using a general DL-based AST for CT images saves time and improves consistency.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline Idioma: En Revista: Diagnostics (Basel) Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Finlândia

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline Idioma: En Revista: Diagnostics (Basel) Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Finlândia