Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A survey analysis of knowledge levels of urologists about radiation safety and fluoroscopy use.
Altintas, Emre; Bahceci, Tuncer; Batur, Ali Furkan; Kaynar, Mehmet; Kilic, Ozcan; Akand, Murat; Goktas, Serdar; Gul, Murat.
Afiliação
  • Altintas E; Department of Urology, Akcakale State Hospital, Sanliurfa, Turkey.
  • Bahceci T; Department of Urology, Sanliurfa Training and Research Hospital, Sanliurfa, Turkey.
  • Batur AF; Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Selcuk University, Konya, Turkey.
  • Kaynar M; Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Selcuk University, Konya, Turkey.
  • Kilic O; Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Selcuk University, Konya, Turkey.
  • Akand M; Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Selcuk University, Konya, Turkey.
  • Goktas S; Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Selcuk University, Konya, Turkey.
  • Gul M; Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Selcuk University, Konya, Turkey.
Int J Clin Pract ; 75(4): e13862, 2021 Apr.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33237621
AIMS: To evaluate the awareness of the use of fluoroscopy in endourological procedures, as well as the theoretical and practical applications of preventive measures. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Between May 2018 and April 2019, a 26-question survey prepared using Google Docs was sent to urologists via email. Personal information, radiation training and behaviours related to radiation and fluoroscopy usage, and the use of protective equipment were queried. RESULTS: A total of 226 participants fully completed and returned the email survey. Of the 226 participants, 78 (34.5%) were academics, 44 (19.4%) were residents while 104 (46.1%) were experts. More than 60% of the participants stated that they participated in the operation requiring less than five fluoroscopy use per week. The majority of operations requiring fluoroscopy consisted of endourological procedures. The lead apron was used by 93% of the participants, but the use of protective glasses and gloves was very low (3.5%). The majority of academicians, experts and residents did not use dosimeters (76.9%, 82.7% and 81.8%, respectively). More than 50% of the participants did not have literature information about the harmful effects of radiation with the use of fluoroscopy. The most common complaints on the day of fluoroscopy were fatigue and headache. CONCLUSION: The lack of information regarding the radiation protection measures and harmful effects of radiation is common among urologists in Turkey. Therefore, systematic training programs on fluoroscopy use and radiation exposure should be provided during urology residency.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Proteção Radiológica / Exposição Ocupacional Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: Int J Clin Pract Assunto da revista: MEDICINA Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Turquia

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Proteção Radiológica / Exposição Ocupacional Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: Int J Clin Pract Assunto da revista: MEDICINA Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Turquia