Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Impact and effectiveness of the 10-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine on invasive pneumococcal disease among children under 5 years of age in the Netherlands.
Peckeu, L; van der Ende, A; de Melker, H E; Sanders, E A M; Knol, M J.
Afiliação
  • Peckeu L; European Programme for Intervention Epidemiology Training (EPIET), European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC), Stockholm, Sweden; National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, the Netherlands.
  • van der Ende A; Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention and the Netherlands Reference Laboratory of Bacterial Meningitis, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • de Melker HE; National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, the Netherlands.
  • Sanders EAM; National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, the Netherlands.
  • Knol MJ; National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, the Netherlands. Electronic address: mirjam.knol@rivm.nl.
Vaccine ; 39(2): 431-437, 2021 01 08.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33243632
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

In 2011, the 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV7) was replaced by the 10-valent vaccine (PCV10) in the Netherlands. We report on impact and effectiveness against invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) in children aged under 5 years by switching from PCV7 to PCV10.

METHOD:

We included IPD cases between 2004 and 2019 in children aged < 5 years reported via the national surveillance system. To assess the impact of the PCV10 vaccination program we compared IPD incidence 6-8 years after PCV10 introduction (2017-2019) to the two years just before the switch to PCV10 (2009-2011). We estimated vaccine effectiveness (VE) using the indirect cohort method, comparing vaccination status (at least two vaccine doses) in IPD-cases caused by PCV10 serotypes (cases) to non-PCV10 IPD cases (controls), in children eligible for PCV10.

RESULTS:

The overall incidence decreased from 8.7 (n = 162) in 2009-2011 to 7.3 per 100.000 (n = 127) in 2017-2019 (Incidence rate ratio (IRR) 0.83, 95%CI 0.66; 1.05). IPD caused by the additional serotypes included in PCV10 declined by 93% (IRR 0.07, 95%CI 0.02; 0.23). Incidence of non-PCV10 IPD showed a non-significant increase (IRR 1.25, 95%CI 0.96; 1.63). Among 231 IPD-cases eligible for PCV10, the overall VE was 91% (95%CI 67; 97) and did not differ by sex or age at diagnosis. Effectiveness against non-PCV10 serotype 19A IPD was non-significant with an estimate of 28% (95%CI-179; 81).

CONCLUSION:

PCV10 is highly effective in protecting against IPD in Dutch children under 5 years with limited serotype replacement after switching from PCV7 to PCV10. We found no evidence for significant cross-protection of PCV10 against 19A serotype IPD.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Infecções Pneumocócicas / Streptococcus pneumoniae Tipo de estudo: Incidence_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Child / Child, preschool / Humans / Infant País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Vaccine Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Infecções Pneumocócicas / Streptococcus pneumoniae Tipo de estudo: Incidence_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Child / Child, preschool / Humans / Infant País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Vaccine Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda