Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Defining the dose-volume criteria for laryngeal sparing in locally advanced oropharyngeal cancer utilizing split-field IMRT, whole-field IMRT and VMAT.
Wilke, Christopher; Takiar, Vinita; Wang, He; Moreno, Amy C; Tung, Shih-Ming Samuel; Quinlan-Davidson, Sean R; Garden, Adam S; Rosenthal, David I; Fuller, Clifton D; Gunn, Gary B; Reddy, Jay P; Morrison, William H; Wang, Congjun; Zhao, George; Hutcheson, Katherine A; Phan, Jack.
Afiliação
  • Wilke C; Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Takiar V; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
  • Wang H; Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Moreno AC; Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Tung SS; Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Quinlan-Davidson SR; Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Garden AS; Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Rosenthal DI; Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Fuller CD; Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Gunn GB; Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Reddy JP; Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Morrison WH; Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Wang C; Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Zhao G; Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Hutcheson KA; Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Phan J; Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
J Appl Clin Med Phys ; 22(1): 37-44, 2021 Jan.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33277960
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To determine the optimal dose-volume constraint for laryngeal sparing using three commonly employed intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) approaches in patients with oropharyngeal cancer treated to the bilateral neck. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Thirty patients with stage II-IVA oropharynx cancers received definitive radiotherapy with split-field IMRT (SF-IMRT) to the bilateral neck between 2008 and 2013. Each case was re-planned using whole-field IMRT (WF-IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and plan quality metrics and dose to laryngeal structures was evaluated. Two larynx volumes were defined and compared on the current study the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) larynx as defined per the RTOG 1016 protocol and the MDACC larynx defined as the components of the larynx bounded by the superior and inferior extent of the thyroid cartilage.

RESULTS:

Target coverage, conformity, and heterogeneity indices were similar in all techniques. The RTOG larynx mean dose was lower with WF-IMRT than SF-IMRT (22.1 vs 25.8 Gy; P < 0.01). The MDACC larynx mean dose was 17.5 Gy ± 5.4 Gy with no differences between the 3 techniques. WF-IMRT and VMAT plans were associated with lower mean doses to the supraglottic larynx (42.1 vs 41.2 vs 54.8 Gy; P < 0.01) and esophagus (18.1 vs 18.2 vs 36 Gy; P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS:

Modern whole field techniques can provide effective laryngeal sparing in patients receiving radiotherapy to the bilateral neck for advanced oropharyngeal cancers.

SUMMARY:

We evaluated laryngeal dose in patients with locally advanced oropharyngeal cancer treated to the bilateral neck using split-field IMRT (SF-IMRT), whole-field IMRT (WF-IMRT) and volumetric arc therapy (VMAT). All three techniques provided good sparing of laryngeal structures and were able to achieve a mean larynx dose < 33 Gy. There were no significant differences in dose to target structures or non-laryngeal organs at risk among techniques.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Orofaríngeas / Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada / Laringe Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Guideline Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Appl Clin Med Phys Assunto da revista: BIOFISICA Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Orofaríngeas / Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada / Laringe Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Guideline Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Appl Clin Med Phys Assunto da revista: BIOFISICA Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos