Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Introduction of telemedicine for medication abortion: Changes in service delivery patterns in two U.S. states.
Kohn, Julia E; Snow, Jennifer L; Grossman, Daniel; Thompson, Terri-Ann; Seymour, Jane W; Simons, Hannah R.
Afiliação
  • Kohn JE; Planned Parenthood Federation of America, New York, NY, USA. Electronic address: juliakohn@gmail.com.
  • Snow JL; Planned Parenthood Federation of America, New York, NY, USA.
  • Grossman D; Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health (ANSIRH), Bixby Center for Global Reproductive Health, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, Oakland, CA, USA.
  • Thompson TA; Ibis Reproductive Health, Cambridge, MA, USA.
  • Seymour JW; Ibis Reproductive Health, Cambridge, MA, USA.
  • Simons HR; Planned Parenthood Federation of America, New York, NY, USA.
Contraception ; 103(3): 151-156, 2021 03.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33359507
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE(S) Telemedicine for medication abortion (teleMAB) is safe and effective, yet little is known about how its introduction affects service delivery. We assessed changes in service delivery patterns 1 year after introducing teleMAB at Planned Parenthood in 2 U.S. states. STUDY

DESIGN:

Retrospective records analysis using electronic health record data from Planned Parenthood health centers in Montana and Nevada from 2015 to 2018. We included all patients receiving medication or aspiration abortion in the year before and after introducing site-to-site teleMAB. Outcomes included the proportion of medication abortions (vs. aspiration); gestational age at abortion; time to appointment; and distance traveled. We compared outcomes pre- and postimplementation using χ2, t tests, and Mann-Whitney U tests.

RESULTS:

We analyzed data for 3,038 abortions 1,314 pre- and 1,724 postimplementation. In Montana, the proportion of medication abortions increased postimplementation (60% vs. 65%, p = 0.04). Mean gestational age was similar 58 versus 57 days (p = 0.35). Mean time to appointment decreased (14 vs. 12 days, p < 0.0001), as did one-way distance traveled by patients (134 vs. 115 miles, p = 0.03). In Nevada, where Planned Parenthood only provided medication abortion, total medication abortions increased (461 vs. 735). Mean gestational age remained stable (51 vs. 51 days, p = 0.33), as did time to appointment (8 vs. 8 days, p = 0.76). Mean one-way distance traveled was 47 miles in the preperiod versus 34 miles in the postperiod (p = 0.22). CONCLUSION(S) Medication abortion increased after the introduction of telemedicine in both states, though we cannot account for abortions performed by other providers. Telemedicine has the potential to improve access to medication abortion. IMPLICATIONS Telemedicine has the potential to improve or maintain access to medication abortion and should be taken to scale where feasible. Continued efforts are needed to mitigate or reverse policy restrictions on telemedicine for medication abortion.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Aborto Induzido / Telemedicina Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Contraception Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Aborto Induzido / Telemedicina Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Contraception Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article