Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Validation of visual acuity applications for teleophthalmology during COVID-19.
Satgunam, PremNandhini; Thakur, Monika; Sachdeva, Virender; Reddy, Sneha; Rani, Padmaja Kumari.
Afiliação
  • Satgunam P; Brien Holden Institute of Optometry and Vision Sciences, Hyderabad Eye Research Foundation, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, India.
  • Thakur M; Brien Holden Institute of Optometry and Vision Sciences, Hyderabad Eye Research Foundation, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, India.
  • Sachdeva V; Child Sight Institute, Nimmagadda Prasad Children's Eye Care Centre, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Visakhapatnam, India.
  • Reddy S; Center for Innovation, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, India.
  • Rani PK; Head, Teleophthalmology (LVPEI Network), Smt. Kanuri Santhamma Centre for Vitreo-Retinal Diseases, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, India.
Indian J Ophthalmol ; 69(2): 385-390, 2021 Feb.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33380619
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

The objective of this study was to identify and validate smartphone-based visual acuity (VA) apps that can be used in a teleophthalmology portal.

METHODS:

The study was conducted in three phases A survey to investigate if the SmartOptometry App was easy to download, understand and test (phase I), an in-clinic comparison of VA measured in a random testing order with four tools namely COMPlog, Reduced Snellen near vision, Peek Acuity (Distance VA) and SmartOptometry (Near VA) (phase II) and a repeatability study on these 4 tools by measuring VA again (phase III). The study recruited the employees of our institute and adhered to the strict COVID-19 protocols of testing.

RESULTS:

Phase I Survey (n = 40) showed 90% of participants used android phones, 60% reported that instructions were clear, and all users were able to self-assess their near VA with SmartOptometry App. Phase II (n = 68) revealed that Peek Acuity was comparable to COMPlog VA (P = 0.31), however SmartOptometry was statistically significantly different (within 2 log MAR lines) from Reduced Snellen near vision test, particularly for young (n = 44, P = 0.004) and emmetropic (n = 16, P = 0.04) participants. All the 4 tests were found to be repeatable in phase III (n = 10) with a coefficient of repeatability ≤0.14.

CONCLUSION:

Smartphone-based apps were easy to download and can be used for checking patient's distance and near visual acuity. An effect of age and refractive error should be considered when interpreting the results. Further studies with real-time patients are required to identify potential benefits and challenges to solve.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Oftalmologia / Erros de Refração / Testes Visuais / Acuidade Visual / Telemedicina / Aplicativos Móveis / COVID-19 Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Indian J Ophthalmol Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Índia

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Oftalmologia / Erros de Refração / Testes Visuais / Acuidade Visual / Telemedicina / Aplicativos Móveis / COVID-19 Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Indian J Ophthalmol Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Índia