Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Pre-Outpatient Group Education and Assessment in Chronic Pain: A Systematic Review.
Mullins, Cormac Francis; Bak, Braydon; Moore, David.
Afiliação
  • Mullins CF; St. James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
  • Bak B; Royal College of Surgeons, Dublin, Ireland.
  • Moore D; Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Pain Med ; 23(1): 89-104, 2022 01 03.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33787896
BACKGROUND: Pre-outpatient interventions in chronic pain have the potential to improve patient self-management earlier in primary or secondary care, which may minimize pain chronicity and negative health outcomes. The literature for this is sparse, and there are no existing systematic reviews on this topic. METHODS: The purpose of this systematic review is to examine the evidence for pre-outpatient group interventions in chronic pain. RESULTS: We identified four studies that looked at this: two randomized control trials, one prospective observational study, and one descriptive study. We identified high-quality evidence that a pre-outpatient group intervention reduces waiting times, moderate-quality evidence that it results in reduced costs per patient, very low-quality evidence that it reduces health care utilization, and very low-quality evidence that it improves service throughput. There were moderate-to-low levels of participant engagement with the initiative, which varied across the included studies. For patient outcome measures, we found no evidence that a pre-outpatient group intervention improves pain intensity, very low-quality evidence that it improves pain-related interference, low-quality evidence that it increases use of pain management strategies and produces high satisfaction levels, low-quality evidence that it improves pain self-efficacy, and no evidence that it improves psychological distress. CONCLUSIONS: Group interventions before individual appointments have the potential to provide important improvements in service delivery, including improvements in waiting times and cost per patient. Benefits for patient outcome measures are less clear. Clinical heterogeneity and high levels of bias existed in the included studies. Further research is required so that meaningful conclusions can be made about these interventions.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Dor Crônica Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Pain Med Assunto da revista: NEUROLOGIA / PSICOFISIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Irlanda

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Dor Crônica Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Pain Med Assunto da revista: NEUROLOGIA / PSICOFISIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Irlanda