Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Using risk analysis to ensure patients' medication safety during hospital relocations and evacuations.
Schumacher, Laurence; Berthaudin, Florian; Blanc, Anne-Laure; Blatrie, Cédric; Staines, Anthony; Bonnabry, Pascal; Widmer, Nicolas.
Afiliação
  • Schumacher L; Pharmacy of Eastern Vaud Hospitals, Rennaz, Switzerland.
  • Berthaudin F; Specialised Centre for Emergency and Disaster Pharmacy, Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences of Western Switzerland, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
  • Blanc AL; Specialised Centre for Emergency and Disaster Pharmacy, Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences of Western Switzerland, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
  • Blatrie C; Pharmacy of Eastern Vaud Hospitals, Rennaz, Switzerland.
  • Staines A; Pharmacy of Eastern Vaud Hospitals, Rennaz, Switzerland.
  • Bonnabry P; Vaud Hospital Federation, Prilly, Switzerland.
  • Widmer N; Université Jean Moulin Lyon 3 IFROSS, Lyon, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes, France.
Eur J Hosp Pharm ; 28(Suppl 2): e171-e179, 2021 11.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33832916
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To ensure patient safety and the preparedness of medication processes during hospital relocations and evacuations by using Failure Modes, Effects, and Criticality Analysis (FMECA).

METHODS:

The relocation of six regional hospitals to a single building, resulting in 400 beds being moved, could be compared with an emergency evacuation. An FMECA was performed on the hospital group's internal medicine and intensive care units (IMU and ICU), examining how medication processes would be affected by a hospital relocation or evacuation.

RESULTS:

We identified 59 hospital relocation and 68 evacuation failure modes. Failure modes were ranked based on their criticality index (CI; range 1-810). The higher the CI, the greater the patient-related risk. Average initial IMU and ICU hospital relocation CI scores were 160 (range 105-294) and 201 (range 125-343), respectively, subsequently reduced to 32 (-80%) and 49 (-76%) after mitigation measures. Average initial IMU and ICU evacuation CI scores were 319 (range 245-504) and 592 (range 441-810), respectively, subsequently reduced to 194 (-39%) and 282 (-52%). Most mitigation measures (17/22), such as for example checklists, could be implemented in both situations. Due to their unpredictable nature, five measures were specific to evacuation situations.

CONCLUSIONS:

This study highlights the value of using an FMECA on medication processes to anticipate potential negative impacts on patient safety during hospital relocations or evacuations. Preparation for a hospital relocation can provide useful knowledge and an opportunity to test mitigation measures that might prove useful in evacuations.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Hospitais / Unidades de Terapia Intensiva Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Hosp Pharm Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Suíça

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Hospitais / Unidades de Terapia Intensiva Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Hosp Pharm Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Suíça