Comparison and evaluation of single-use LMA supreme versus the reusable proseal LMA in paralyzed patients undergoing surgery with controlled ventilation.

Sood, Suvidha; Chahar, Shikha; Thakur, Anil; Gupta, Madhu; Saxena, Anupriya; Subramanian, Shalini

Sood, Suvidha; Chahar, Shikha; Thakur, Anil; Gupta, Madhu; Saxena, Anupriya; Subramanian, Shalini.

Afiliação

Sood S; Department of Anesthesiology, ESI-PGIMSR, Basaidarapur, New Delhi, India.
Chahar S; Department of Anesthesiology, ESI-PGIMSR, Basaidarapur, New Delhi, India.
Thakur A; Department of Anesthesiology, ESI-PGIMSR, Basaidarapur, New Delhi, India.
Gupta M; Department of Anesthesiology, ESI-PGIMSR, Basaidarapur, New Delhi, India.
Saxena A; Department of Anesthesiology, ESI-PGIMSR, Basaidarapur, New Delhi, India.
Subramanian S; Department of Anesthesiology, Narayana Nethralaya, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.

J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol ; 36(4): 494-499, 2020.

Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33840930

Palavras-chave

Endotracheal tube; Intracuff pressure; Oropharyngeal leak Pressure; Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway; Supreme Laryngeal Mask Airway

Texto completo

Imprimir

XML

PubMed Links

Buscar no Google

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Idioma: En Revista: J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Índia

Texto completo

Imprimir

XML

PubMed Links

Buscar no Google