Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Leaf size estimation based on leaf length, width and shape.
Schrader, Julian; Shi, Peijian; Royer, Dana L; Peppe, Daniel J; Gallagher, Rachael V; Li, Yirong; Wang, Rong; Wright, Ian J.
Afiliação
  • Schrader J; Department of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, NSW 2109, Australia.
  • Shi P; Department of Biodiversity, Macroecology and Biogeography, University of Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany.
  • Royer DL; Bamboo Research Institute, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, P.R. China.
  • Peppe DJ; Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Wesleyan University, Middletown, CT 06459, USA.
  • Gallagher RV; Terrestrial Paleoclimatology Research Group, Department of Geosciences, Baylor University, Waco, TX 76706, USA.
  • Li Y; Department of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, NSW 2109, Australia.
  • Wang R; Bamboo Research Institute, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, P.R. China.
  • Wright IJ; Bamboo Research Institute, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, P.R. China.
Ann Bot ; 128(4): 395-406, 2021 09 03.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34157097
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND

AIMS:

Leaf size has considerable ecological relevance, making it desirable to obtain leaf size estimations for as many species worldwide as possible. Current global databases, such as TRY, contain leaf size data for ~30 000 species, which is only ~8% of known species worldwide. Yet, taxonomic descriptions exist for the large majority of the remainder. Here we propose a simple method to exploit information on leaf length, width and shape from species descriptions to robustly estimate leaf areas, thus closing this considerable knowledge gap for this important plant functional trait.

METHODS:

Using a global dataset of all major leaf shapes measured on 3125 leaves from 780 taxa, we quantified scaling functions that estimate leaf size as a product of leaf length, width and a leaf shape-specific correction factor. We validated our method by comparing leaf size estimates with those obtained from image recognition software and compared our approach with the widely used correction factor of 2/3. KEY

RESULTS:

Correction factors ranged from 0.39 for highly dissected, lobed leaves to 0.79 for oblate leaves. Leaf size estimation using leaf shape-specific correction factors was more accurate and precise than estimates obtained from the correction factor of 2/3.

CONCLUSION:

Our method presents a tractable solution to accurately estimate leaf size when only information on leaf length, width and shape is available or when labour and time constraints prevent usage of image recognition software. We see promise in applying our method to data from species descriptions (including from fossils), databases, field work and on herbarium vouchers, especially when non-destructive in situ measurements are needed.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Software / Folhas de Planta Idioma: En Revista: Ann Bot Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Austrália

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Software / Folhas de Planta Idioma: En Revista: Ann Bot Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Austrália