Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Geriatric Sinus Surgery: A Review of Demographic Variables, Surgical Success and Complications in Elderly Surgical Patients.
Helman, Samuel N; Carlton, Daniel; Deutsch, Brian; Choake, Robert; Patel, Varun; Govindaraj, Satish; Iloreta, Alfred M C; Del Signore, Anthony.
Afiliação
  • Helman SN; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
  • Carlton D; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital-New York Eye and Ear Infirmary of Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
  • Deutsch B; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital-New York Eye and Ear Infirmary of Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
  • Choake R; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital-New York Eye and Ear Infirmary of Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
  • Patel V; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Albany Medical Center, Albany, New York.
  • Govindaraj S; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital-New York Eye and Ear Infirmary of Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
  • Iloreta AMC; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital-New York Eye and Ear Infirmary of Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
  • Del Signore A; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital-New York Eye and Ear Infirmary of Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
Allergy Rhinol (Providence) ; 12: 21526567211010736, 2021.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34158983
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Demonstrate feasibility, safety and outcome metrics of geriatric sinus surgery (GESS). STUDY

DESIGN:

Retrospective review of patients undergoing sinus surgery for indication of chronic rhinosinusitis with and without nasal polyposis.

SETTING:

Tertiary referral center.

PARTICIPANTS:

Patients who underwent FESS from 2008-2017; excluding skull base, craniofacial, or oncologic surgery. Primary study group were patients aged 65 years and older. Patients aged 40-64 years of age were included for comparison.Main Outcomes and

Measures:

Multivariate analysis was performed to identify independently associated patient characteristics and perioperative variables. Preoperative medical and treatment history, revision and primary surgery, preoperative and post-operative SNOT-22 and NOSE scores, Lund-McKay scores were recorded when available. Post-operative data was assessed at a minimum of two months after the index procedure. Post-operative complications were included.

RESULTS:

Ninety-one (91) patients met criteria. 21.2% of the geriatric patients were taking systemic anticoagulation prior to surgery, and underwent treatment with nasal steroids (25.0%), oral antibiotics (67.7%), nasal irrigations (48.4%), and systemic steroids (37.5%) over an average of 7.3 months prior to surgery. There was an average post-operative reduction of 15.0 points (p < 0.0001) and 42.5 points (p = 0.0008) for SNOT-22 and NOSE scores, respectively. Average operative time was 117.4 minutes in geriatric patients compared to 183.4 minutes in younger patients (p = 0.004), with an average estimated blood loss of 55.6 milliliters (mL) compared to younger patients (111.8 mL) (p = 0.04). Linear regression identified revision surgery as associated with reductions in Sinonasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) scores (p = 0.011). Geriatric patients had a shorter operative time (p = 0.011) while male sex was associated with a longer operative time (p = 0.014). Patients over 65 had fewer minor complications (p = 0.01), and there were no major complications in either group. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Geriatric sinus surgery is effective and safe in this cohort of patients.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Allergy Rhinol (Providence) Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Allergy Rhinol (Providence) Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article