Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Therapy of chronic hepatitis C in people who inject drugs: focus on adherence.
Frankova, Sona; Jandova, Zuzana; Jinochova, Gabriela; Kreidlova, Miluse; Merta, Dusan; Sperl, Jan.
Afiliação
  • Frankova S; Department of Hepatogastroenterology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Videnska 1958/9, 14021, Prague, Czech Republic. sona.frankova@ikem.cz.
  • Jandova Z; Psychiatric Hospital Havlickuv Brod, Havlickuv Brod, Czech Republic.
  • Jinochova G; First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
  • Kreidlova M; Psychiatric Hospital Havlickuv Brod, Havlickuv Brod, Czech Republic.
  • Merta D; Addiction Centre Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
  • Sperl J; Institute of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Diagnostics, First Faculty of Medicine Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Harm Reduct J ; 18(1): 69, 2021 06 30.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34193156
BACKGROUND: Intravenous drug use (IVDU) represents the major factor of HCV transmission, but the treatment uptake among people who inject drugs (PWID) remains low owing to a false presumption of low efficacy. The aim of our study was to assess treatment efficacy in PWID and factors determining adherence to therapy. METHODS: A total of 278 consecutive patients starting DAA (direct-acting antivirals) therapy were included, divided into two groups: individuals with a history of IVDU, PWID group (N = 101) and the control group (N = 177) without a history of IVDU. RESULTS: Sustained virological response 12 weeks after the end of therapy (SVR12) was achieved by 99/101 (98%) and 172/177 (98%) patients in the PWID and control group, respectively; in PWID group, two patients were lost to follow-up, and in the control group, four patients relapsed and one was lost to follow-up. PWID patients postponed appointments significantly more often, 29 (28.7%) in PWID versus 7 (4%) in the control group, p = 0.001. Thirteen of 101 (12.9%) and six of 177 (3.4%) patients in the PWID and in the control group, respectively, missed at least one visit (p < 0.01). However, postponing visits led to a lack of medication in only one PWID. In the PWID group, older age (p < 0.05; OR 1.07, 95% CI 1.00-1.20) and stable housing (p < 0.01; OR 9.70, 95% CI 2.10-56.20) were factors positively contributing to adherence. Contrarily, a stable job was a factor negatively influencing adherence (p < 0.05; OR 0.24, 95% CI 0.06-0.81). In the control group, none of the analyzed social and demographic factors had an impact on adherence to therapy. CONCLUSIONS: In PWID, treatment efficacy was excellent and was comparable with SVR of the control group. Stable housing and older age contributed to a better adherence to therapy.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Preparações Farmacêuticas / Abuso de Substâncias por Via Intravenosa / Hepatite C / Hepatite C Crônica Limite: Aged / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Harm Reduct J Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: República Tcheca

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Preparações Farmacêuticas / Abuso de Substâncias por Via Intravenosa / Hepatite C / Hepatite C Crônica Limite: Aged / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Harm Reduct J Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: República Tcheca