Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Target position and avoidance margin effects on path planning in obstacle avoidance.
Saeedpour-Parizi, Mohammad R; Hassan, Shirin E; Azad, Ariful; Baute, Kelly J; Baniasadi, Tayebeh; Shea, John B.
Afiliação
  • Saeedpour-Parizi MR; Department of Kinesiology, School of Public Health, Indiana University Bloomington, 1025 E 7th Street, Bloomington, IN, 47405, USA. rsaeed@iu.edu.
  • Hassan SE; Department of Intelligent Systems Engineering, Luddy School of Informatics, Computing, and Engineering, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, IN, USA. rsaeed@iu.edu.
  • Azad A; School of Optometry, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, IN, USA.
  • Baute KJ; Department of Intelligent Systems Engineering, Luddy School of Informatics, Computing, and Engineering, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, IN, USA.
  • Baniasadi T; Splendid Earth Wellness LLC, Seymour, USA.
  • Shea JB; Department of Kinesiology, School of Public Health, Indiana University Bloomington, 1025 E 7th Street, Bloomington, IN, 47405, USA.
Sci Rep ; 11(1): 15285, 2021 07 27.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34315936
ABSTRACT
This study examined how people choose their path to a target, and the visual information they use for path planning. Participants avoided stepping outside an avoidance margin between a stationary obstacle and the edge of a walkway as they walked to a bookcase and picked up a target from different locations on a shelf. We provided an integrated explanation for path selection by combining avoidance margin, deviation angle, and distance to the obstacle. We found that the combination of right and left avoidance margins accounted for 26%, deviation angle accounted for 39%, and distance to the obstacle accounted for 35% of the variability in decisions about the direction taken to circumvent an obstacle on the way to a target. Gaze analysis findings showed that participants directed their gaze to minimize the uncertainty involved in successful task performance and that gaze sequence changed with obstacle location. In some cases, participants chose to circumvent the obstacle on a side for which the gaze time was shorter, and the path was longer than for the opposite side. Our results of a path selection judgment test showed that the threshold for participants abandoning their preferred side for circumventing the obstacle was a target location of 15 cm to the left of the bookcase shelf center.

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Sci Rep Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Sci Rep Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos