Can preoperative renal mass biopsy change clinical practice and reduce surgical intervention for small renal masses?

INTRODUCTION: The role of renal biopsy prior to surgical intervention for a renal mass remains controversial despite the fact that for all other urological organs except the testicle, biopsy inevitably precedes treatment as is true for all other specialties dealing with solid masses (e.g. thyroid, breast, colon, liver, etc.). Accordingly, we sought to determine the impact of a routine biopsy regimen on the course of patients with cT1a lesions in comparison with a contemporary series of cT1a individuals who went directly to treatment without a preoperative biopsy. METHODS: We analyzed a multi-institutional, prospectively maintained database of patients who underwent an office-based, ultrasound-guided, renal mass biopsy (RMB) for a cT1a renal mass (i.e. ≤4cm in largest dimension). Controls were selected from all patients in the database who had a cT1a renal lesion but did not undergo RMB. Both groups were analyzed for differences in treatment modality and surgical pathology results. RESULTS: A total of 72 RMB and 73 control patients were analyzed. The groups were similar in regards to their baseline characteristics. Overall RMB diagnostic rate was 75%. Surgical pathology revealed that excision of benign tumors was eight-fold less in the RMB cohort compared to the control group (3% vs. 23%; P < 0.001). Additionally, the rate of active surveillance in the RMB cohort was nearly three times higher at 35% vs. 14% for the controls (P < 0.001). Biopsy was concordant with surgical pathology in 97% of cases for primary histology (i.e. benign vs. malignant), 97% for histologic subtype, and 46% for low (I or II) vs. high (III or IV) grade. On multivariate analysis patients who underwent surgical intervention without preoperative RMB were 6.7 times more likely to have benign histopathology compared to patients who underwent preoperative RMB (OR 6.7, 95% CI = 0.714 - 63.626, P = 0.096). There were no procedural or post-procedural RMB complications. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with cT1a lesions, the implementation of routine office-based RMB led to a significant decrease in the rate of surgical intervention for benign tumors. This practice also resulted in a higher rate of active surveillance for the management of renal cortical neoplasms with benign histopathology compared to a control group.