Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mechanical Parameters and Trajectory of Two Chinese Cervical Manipulations Compared by a Motion Capture System.
Huang, Xuecheng; Lin, Dongxin; Liang, Zeyu; Deng, Yuping; He, Zaopeng; Wang, Mian; Tan, Jinchuan; Li, Yikai; Yang, Yang; Huang, Wenhua.
Afiliação
  • Huang X; National Key Discipline of Human Anatomy, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
  • Lin D; Guangdong Engineering Research Center for Translation of Medical 3D Printing Application, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
  • Liang Z; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Medical Biomechanics, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
  • Deng Y; Shenzhen Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Shenzhen, China.
  • He Z; National Key Discipline of Human Anatomy, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
  • Wang M; Guangdong Engineering Research Center for Translation of Medical 3D Printing Application, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
  • Tan J; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Medical Biomechanics, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
  • Li Y; National Key Discipline of Human Anatomy, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
  • Yang Y; Guangdong Engineering Research Center for Translation of Medical 3D Printing Application, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
  • Huang W; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Medical Biomechanics, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Front Bioeng Biotechnol ; 9: 714292, 2021.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34381767
ABSTRACT

Objective:

To compare the mechanical parameters and trajectory while operating the oblique pulling manipulation and the cervical rotation-traction manipulation.

Methods:

An experimental research measuring kinematics parameter and recording motion trajectories of two cervical manipulations were carried out. A total of 48 healthy volunteers participated in this study, who were randomly divided into two groups of 24 representing each of the two manipulations. A clinician performed two manipulations in two groups separately. A motion capture system was used to monitor and analyze kinematics parameters during the operation.

Results:

The two cervical manipulations have similar thrust time, displacement, mean velocity, max velocity, and max acceleration. There were no significant differences in active and passive amplitudes between the two cervical rotation manipulations. The thrust amplitudes of the oblique pulling manipulation and the cervical rotation-traction manipulation were 5.735 ± 3.041° and 2.142 ± 1.742°, respectively. The thrust amplitudes of the oblique pulling manipulation was significantly greater than that of the cervical rotation-traction manipulation (P < 0.001).

Conclusion:

Compared with the oblique pulling manipulation, the cervical rotation-traction manipulation has a less thrust amplitudes.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Front Bioeng Biotechnol Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Front Bioeng Biotechnol Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China