Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Low-energy high-frequency Ho-YAG lithotripsy: is RIRS going forward? A case-control study.
Peretti, D; Dalmasso, E; Pecoraro, A; Ambruosi, C; Venzano, F; Fiori, C; Porpiglia, F; Maugeri, O.
Afiliação
  • Peretti D; Department of Urology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Turin, Italy. dario.peretti1990@gmail.com.
  • Dalmasso E; ASO S. Croce e Carle Cuneo, Cuneo, Italy.
  • Pecoraro A; Department of Urology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Turin, Italy.
  • Ambruosi C; ASO S. Croce e Carle Cuneo, Cuneo, Italy.
  • Venzano F; ASO S. Croce e Carle Cuneo, Cuneo, Italy.
  • Fiori C; Department of Urology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Turin, Italy.
  • Porpiglia F; Department of Urology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Turin, Italy.
  • Maugeri O; ASO S. Croce e Carle Cuneo, Cuneo, Italy.
Urolithiasis ; 50(1): 79-85, 2022 Feb.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34424352
ABSTRACT
Retrograde Intra-Renal Surgery (RIRS) plays a primary role in renal stone treatment context. Energy, frequency and width of laser impulse can be modulated by surgeons to achieve better outcomes. In our study, patients with single renal stone sized 10-20 mm were retrospectively divided into two groups. Patients of Group 1 underwent RIRS with Low-Energy (LE) High-Frequency (HF) settings using Lumenis® 120-W high-power HoYAG laser. Patients of Group 2 (control) underwent RIRS using "standard" settings by means of Sphinx® Jr 30 W HoYAG system. Follow-up was conducted with a CT scan at 3 months after RIRS in both groups. Procedure success was defined as stone-free or presence of ≤ 4 mm fragments (Clinical Insignificant Residual Fragments-CIRF). A total number of 199 patients were included 86 LE/HF RIRS (Group 1) vs 113 "conventional" RIRS (Group 2). Mean operative time was 56.6 (± 19.4) min in Group 1 vs 65.2 (± 25.2) min in Group 2 (p = 0.01). Mean hospitalization time was 2.5 ± 1.7 days for Group 1 vs 2.9 ± 3.2 days for Group 2 (p = 0.2). Peri-operative complications were counted eight in Group 1 and 11 in Group 2 (p > 0.05). At 3-month control, stone-free rate was 69% (59/86 patients) in Group 1 vs 65% (73/113 patients) in Group 2 (p = 0.6). Success rate was 93% (80/86) in Group 1 in comparison to 82% (93/113) in Group 2 (p = 0.03). In conclusion, LE/HF RIRS seems to be a feasible and effective technique with a reduction of operative time and optimal results in terms of "stone-free" and "success" rates. Further studies are needed to ensure the validity of our results and to give evidence-based statements.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Litotripsia / Cálculos Renais / Litotripsia a Laser Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Urolithiasis Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Itália

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Litotripsia / Cálculos Renais / Litotripsia a Laser Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Urolithiasis Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Itália