Assessment of Fracture Resistances of Endodontically Treated Teeth Filled with Different Root Canal Filling Systems.
J Pharm Bioallied Sci
; 13(Suppl 1): S109-S111, 2021 Jun.
Article
em En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-34447055
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND:
The motive of endodontic therapy is cleaning, shaping, and subsequently obturation. This study assessed different root canal filling systems in terms of fracture resistances of endodontically treated teeth.METHODOLOGY:
This study was conducted on eighty single-rooted permanent mandibular incisor teeth which were divided into five groups Group I was negative control; Group II was positive control; Group III comprised of gutta-percha/AH Plus; Group IV comprised of Thermafil/AH Plus; and Group V Resilon/Epiphany SE. Universal testing machine measured fracture resistance.RESULTS:
The mean fracture resistance in Group I was 458.6 ± 112.4 N, in Group II was 214.8 ± 104.6 N, in Group III was 428.6 ± 108.2 N, in Group IV was 388.2 ± 126.2 N, and in Group V was 334.8 ± 102.7 N. The difference found to be statistically significant (P < 0.05). Intergroup comparison showed a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05) between Groups I-II, I-V, II-III, and II-IV.CONCLUSION:
The authors found that lateral condensation performed with AH Plus sealer and gutta-percha and the Thermafil technique were the highest among all other methods.
Texto completo:
1
Coleções:
01-internacional
Base de dados:
MEDLINE
Idioma:
En
Revista:
J Pharm Bioallied Sci
Ano de publicação:
2021
Tipo de documento:
Article
País de afiliação:
Índia