Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Can high-intensity interval training improve mental health outcomes in the general population and those with physical illnesses? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Martland, Rebecca; Korman, Nicole; Firth, Joseph; Vancampfort, Davy; Thompson, Trevor; Stubbs, Brendon.
Afiliação
  • Martland R; Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK rebecca.martland@kcl.ac.uk.
  • Korman N; Metro South Addiction and Mental Health Services, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
  • Firth J; School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
  • Vancampfort D; Division of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.
  • Thompson T; Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.
  • Stubbs B; University Psychiatric Centre, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Br J Sports Med ; 56(5): 279-291, 2022 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34531186
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

High-intensity interval training (HIIT) is a safe and feasible form of exercise. The aim of this meta-analysis was to investigate the mental health effects of HIIT, in healthy populations and those with physical illnesses, and to compare the mental health effects to non-active controls and other forms of exercise.

DESIGN:

Random effects meta-analyses were undertaken for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing HIIT with non-active and/or active (exercise) control conditions for the following coprimary

outcomes:

mental well-being, symptoms of depression, anxiety and psychological stress. Positive and negative affect, distress and sleep outcomes were summarised narratively. DATA SOURCES Medline, PsycINFO, Embase and CENTRAL databases were searched from inception to 7 July 2020. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES RCTs that investigated HIIT in healthy populations and/or those with physical illnesses and reported change in mental well-being, depression, anxiety, psychological stress, positive/negative affect, distress and/or sleep quality.

RESULTS:

Fifty-eight RCTs were retrieved. HIIT led to moderate improvements in mental well-being (standardised mean difference (SMD) 0.418; 95% CI 0.135 to 0.701; n=12 studies), depression severity (SMD -0.496; 95% CI -0.973 to -0.020; n=10) and perceived stress (SMD -0.474; 95% CI -0.796 to -0.152; n=4) compared with non-active controls, and small improvements in mental well-being compared with active controls (SMD0.229; 95% CI 0.054 to 0.403; n=12). There was a suggestion that HIIT may improve sleep and psychological distress compared with non-active controls however, these findings were based on a small number of RCTs.

CONCLUSION:

These findings support the use of HIIT for mental health in the general population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE The quality of evidence was moderate-to-high according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) criteria. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42020182643.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Treinamento Intervalado de Alta Intensidade Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Br J Sports Med Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Treinamento Intervalado de Alta Intensidade Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Br J Sports Med Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido