Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Concordance among Swedish, German, Danish, and UK EQ-5D-3L Value Sets: Analyses of Patient-Reported Outcomes in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register.
Teni, Fitsum Sebsibe; Rolfson, Ola; Berg, Jenny; Leidl, Reiner; Burström, Kristina.
Afiliação
  • Teni FS; Health Outcomes and Economic Evaluation Research Group, Department of Learning Informatics, Management and Ethics (LIME), Stockholm Centre for Healthcare Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, 177 71 Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Rolfson O; Health Outcomes and Economic Evaluation Research Group, Department of Learning Informatics, Management and Ethics (LIME), Stockholm Centre for Healthcare Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, 177 71 Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Berg J; Department of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, 413 45 Gothenburg, Sweden.
  • Leidl R; Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register, 413 45 Gothenburg, Sweden.
  • Burström K; Health Outcomes and Economic Evaluation Research Group, Department of Learning Informatics, Management and Ethics (LIME), Stockholm Centre for Healthcare Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, 177 71 Stockholm, Sweden.
J Clin Med ; 10(18)2021 Sep 17.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34575317
ABSTRACT

Background:

Application of different value sets to health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measured with the EQ-5D-3L may lead to different results due to differences in methods, perspectives, and countries used. Focusing on concordance, this study aimed at understanding the implications of applying EQ-5D-3L value sets from Sweden, Germany, Denmark, and the UK to evaluate HRQoL of patients undergoing total hip replacement (THR) in Sweden before and after surgery.

Methods:

We performed a longitudinal study of patients in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register from preoperative stage to 1-year follow-up (n = 73,523) using data collected from 2008 to 2016. Eight EQ-5D-3L value sets from the four countries were compared based on a valuation method (visual analogue scale (VAS) or time trade-off (TTO)), perspective (experience-based or hypothetical), and country. Concordance among the value sets with patient-reported EQ VAS score was also assessed. Longitudinal changes in EQ-5D-3L index over the 1-year follow-up were compared across value sets by method, perspective, and country.

Results:

Value sets based on the same method and perspective showed higher concordance in EQ-5D-3L index at both measurement time points than other comparisons. In the comparisons by perspective, VAS value sets showed higher concordance than TTO value sets. The Swedish VAS and the Danish TTO value sets showed the highest levels of concordance with patient-reported EQ VAS scores. Generally, value sets based on the same method and perspective had the smallest mean differences between changes in EQ-5D-3L indices from preoperative to 1-year postoperative follow-up.

Conclusion:

Among THR patients value sets based on the same method and perspective, a direct transfer of results across countries could be meaningful. In cases of differences in methods and perspectives among value sets, transfer of value sets across settings would have to consider conversion through crosswalk.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Med Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Suécia

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Med Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Suécia