Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Combination of radiographic apparent bone gap and nonunion risk determination score improves accuracy of prediction of tibial shaft delayed union.
Hiyama, Shuhei; Matsumura, Tomohiro; Takahashi, Tsuneari; Ae, Ryusuke; Takeshita, Katsushi.
Afiliação
  • Hiyama S; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Jichi Medical University, Shimotsuke, Japan. Electronic address: m06083sh@jichi.ac.jp.
  • Matsumura T; Jichi Medical University Hospital Life Saving Emergency Center, Shimotsuke, Japan. Electronic address: tomohiro616@jichi.ac.jp.
  • Takahashi T; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Jichi Medical University, Shimotsuke, Japan. Electronic address: tsuneari9@jichi.ac.jp.
  • Ae R; Division of Public Health, Center for Community Medicine, Jichi Medical University, Shimotsuke, Japan. Electronic address: shirouae@jichi.ac.jp.
  • Takeshita K; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Jichi Medical University, Shimotsuke, Japan. Electronic address: dtstake@jichi.ac.jp.
J Orthop Sci ; 28(1): 233-238, 2023 Jan.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34579990
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

There is a need for a novel therapeutic strategy for an earlier prediction of long bone union failure as compared to previous methodologies. This study aimed to determine whether a combination of two diagnostic tools would result in a more accurate diagnosis of delayed union.

METHODS:

The inclusion criteria were as follows patients with tibial shaft fracture who underwent treatment with intramedullary nailing (IMN) as definitive internal fixation (IF). The study included a total of 114 patients with 116 tibial shaft fractures treated with IMN as definitive IF. Radiographic apparent bone gap (RABG) and nonunion risk determination score (NURDS) can be used to predict nonunion. However, this study aimed to determine whether combination of RABG and NURDS could help deduce a more accurate prediction of delayed union.

RESULTS:

The union rate was found to be 85% (99 fractures), the delayed union rate was found to be 15% (17 fractures), and the rate of nonunion requiring additional surgical intervention was estimated to be 4% (5 out of the 17 delayed union cases). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of RABG were found to be 82.3%, 76.0%, 36.8%, and 96.2%, respectively, when an RABG cutoff value of 5.0 mm was applied to our patient cohort. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of NURDS were found to be 47.1%, 82.0%, 30.8%, and 90.1%, respectively, when a NURDS cutoff value of 8.0% was applied to our patient cohort. When RABG and NURDS were above their respective cutoff values, the sensitivity and PPV were estimated to be 90.0% and 56.3%, respectively. When RABG and NURDS were below their respective cutoff values, the specificity and NPV were estimated to be 90.1% and 98.5%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS:

The combination of RABG and NURDS evaluation immediately after surgery helps surgeons identify patients who are at a high risk of delayed union, facilitating careful monitoring of these patients and consideration of additional treatments.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fraturas da Tíbia / Fixação Intramedular de Fraturas / Fraturas não Consolidadas Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Orthop Sci Assunto da revista: ORTOPEDIA Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fraturas da Tíbia / Fixação Intramedular de Fraturas / Fraturas não Consolidadas Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Orthop Sci Assunto da revista: ORTOPEDIA Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article