Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A comparison of 9-min colonoscopy withdrawal time and 6-min colonoscopy withdrawal time: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Bhurwal, Abhishek; Rattan, Puru; Sarkar, Avik; Patel, Anish; Haroon, Shahid; Gjeorgjievski, Mihajlo; Bansal, Vikas; Mutneja, Hemant.
Afiliação
  • Bhurwal A; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson School of Medicine, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.
  • Rattan P; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
  • Sarkar A; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson School of Medicine, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.
  • Patel A; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson School of Medicine, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.
  • Haroon S; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson School of Medicine, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.
  • Gjeorgjievski M; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson School of Medicine, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.
  • Bansal V; Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
  • Mutneja H; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, John H. Stroger Cook County Hospital, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
J Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 36(12): 3260-3267, 2021 Dec.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34617312
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

The optimal colonoscopy withdrawal time is still a controversial topic. While several studies demonstrate that longer withdrawal time improves adenoma detection rate, others have contradicted these findings.

METHODS:

Three independent reviewers performed a comprehensive review of all original articles published from inception to January 2021 and included studies reporting comparison of the two cohorts-(i) ≥ 6 but less than 9 min of colonoscopy withdrawal time (CWT) and (ii) ≥ 9 min of CWT. The outcome measures were the following (i) adenoma detection rate (ADR), (ii) advanced ADR, and (iii) sessile serrated adenoma detection rate (SDR). The meta-analysis was performed, and the statistics were two-tailed.

RESULTS:

A total of seven studies met the inclusion criteria after a thorough search of the literature was completed. The analysis revealed that ≥ 9 min of CWT had significantly higher odds of adenoma detection as compared with 6-9 min of CWT (odds ratio [OR] 1.54, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.30-1.82; I2  = 93.7). Additionally, a significantly higher odds of sessile serrated adenoma detection (OR 1.68, 95% CI 1.28-2.22; I2  = 0) and a trend towards higher odds of advanced adenoma detection (OR 1.38, 95% CI 0.98-1.95, I2  = 90) were seen with CWT of at least 9 min when compared with 6-9 min of CWT.

CONCLUSION:

This systematic review and meta-analysis analysis provides further evidence that at least 9 min of CWT cohort had significantly higher ADR and SDR as compared with the at least 6 min but less than 9 min of cohort.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Adenoma / Colonoscopia Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Gastroenterol Hepatol Assunto da revista: GASTROENTEROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Adenoma / Colonoscopia Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Gastroenterol Hepatol Assunto da revista: GASTROENTEROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos