Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Brachial and Axillary Artery Vascular Access for Endovascular Interventions.
Lentz, Charlotte M; Zogaj, Donika; Wessel, Hanna K; Zeebregts, Clark J; Bokkers, Reinoud P H; van der Laan, Maarten J.
Afiliação
  • Lentz CM; Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
  • Zogaj D; Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
  • Wessel HK; Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
  • Zeebregts CJ; Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
  • Bokkers RPH; Department of Radiology, Medical Imaging Center, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
  • van der Laan MJ; Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. Electronic address: m.j.vd.laan@umcg.nl.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 81: 292-299, 2022 Apr.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34775017
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Endovascular access is usually achieved through the common femoral artery due to its large size and accessibility. Access through the upper extremity can however be necessary due to anatomic reasons, obesity, or peripheral arterial disease. The 2 main methods of access are surgical cutdown and percutaneous puncture. In this single-centre retrospective cohort study we compared complication risks for both surgical cutdown and percutaneous puncture of an upper arm approach. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Data was obtained from patients receiving endovascular access through the brachial or axillary artery between 2005 and 2018. A total of 109 patients were included. Patient demographics including age, sex, medical history, smoking status, and actual medication were registered, as well as postoperative complications including hematoma, thrombosis, dissection, infection, pseudoaneurysm, nerve injury, reoperation, and readmission.

RESULTS:

Access was achieved through surgical cutdown in 53% (n = 58) and through percutaneous puncture in 47% (n = 51) of patients. Fifty-eight percent (n = 63) received access via the brachial artery (BA) and 42% (n = 46) via the axillary artery. Complication rate was 25.0% (3 of 12) for surgical cutdown via the BA, 29.4% (15 of 51) for percutaneous puncture via the BA, and 10.9% (5 of 46) for surgical cutdown via the axillary artery. Major complication rate was 8.3% (1 of 12) for surgical cutdown via the BA, 13.7% (7 of 51) for percutaneous puncture via the BA, and 4.3% (2 of 46) for surgical cutdown via the axillary artery. There was no association between baseline patient characteristics and complication rate.

CONCLUSIONS:

In this nonrandomized retrospective study, surgical cutdown via the axillary artery was the safest option with fewest complications, but selection of patients may have blurred the results. Surgical cutdown and percutaneous puncture seem equally safe in terms of complication rate in the BA.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cateterismo Periférico / Procedimentos Endovasculares Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Ann Vasc Surg Assunto da revista: ANGIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cateterismo Periférico / Procedimentos Endovasculares Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Ann Vasc Surg Assunto da revista: ANGIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda