Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Immune checkpoint inhibitors and hospitalization at home in France.
Gobbini, Elisa; Toffart, Anne-Claire; Boisserie Lacroix, Laure; Pinsolle, Julian; Schoutteten, Laure; Federspiel, Isabelle; Pierret, Thomas; Pérol, Maurice; Feyeux, Amélie.
Afiliação
  • Gobbini E; CHU Grenoble-Alpes, Unité d'oncologie thoracique, 38700 La Tronche, France; Centre de recherche sur le cancer de Lyon, 69008 Lyon, France. Electronic address: egobbini@chu-grenoble.fr.
  • Toffart AC; CHU Grenoble-Alpes, Unité d'oncologie thoracique, 38700 La Tronche, France.
  • Boisserie Lacroix L; Fédération Nationale des Établissement d'Hospitalisation À Domicile, 75013 Paris, France.
  • Pinsolle J; Centre Hospitalier Métropole Savoie, Unité de pneumologie, 73000 Chambéry, France.
  • Schoutteten L; CHU Grenoble-Alpes, Unité d'oncologie médicale, 38700 La Tronche, France.
  • Federspiel I; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble-Alpes, Unité centralisée des préparations médicamenteuses cytotoxiques, Pharmacie hospitalière, La Tronche, France.
  • Pierret T; CHU Grenoble-Alpes, Unité d'oncologie thoracique, 38700 La Tronche, France.
  • Pérol M; Centre Léon Bérard, Unité d'oncologie Thoracique, 69008, Lyon, France.
  • Feyeux A; Centre Hospitalier de Bourg-en-Bresse, Hospitalisation À Domicile, France.
Bull Cancer ; 109(1): 89-97, 2022 Jan.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34785029
CONTEXT: The administration of immune checkpoints inhibitors (ICIs) within hospitalization at home (HaH) organizations is an interesting alternative to conventional care. Three surveys were carried out to describe the different organizational models of French HaHs and criteria used by physicians in patient selection. METHODS: Three surveys were conducted between April 1 and August 31, 2020. The first one was addressed to all French HaHs, and the two others to public HaHs and oncologists treating patients with solid cancer in the Auvergne-Rhone-Alpes region. RESULTS: Overall, 54 French HaHs and 23 oncologists participated to the study. The health professionals involved in the patients' care were very heterogeneous, although in 92% of cases, the treatment prescription was made by the oncologist. HaH physicians were more involved in clinical assessment the day before treatment (19% vs. 0%), treatment validation (56% vs. 15%), and treatment prescription (19% vs. 0%), while nurses were better equipped (emergency kit available in 81% versus 50% of cases) when HaHs did carry out ICIs compared to when they did not. Most oncologists agreed that age, neuropsychiatric disorders, home environment, as well as treatment duration and good tolerance should be considered in patient selection. ECOG PS status and treatment response were less consensually considered. CONCLUSION: These results highlight the variability in French HaH organizations and patient selection criteria for employing ICIs at home. This study resulted in recommendations for administrating ICIs in HaH settings, which will likely be instrumental in further promoting this activity across France.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Serviços Hospitalares de Assistência Domiciliar / Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico / Neoplasias Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Bull Cancer Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Serviços Hospitalares de Assistência Domiciliar / Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico / Neoplasias Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Bull Cancer Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article