Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Expectations of a new opt-out system of consent for deceased organ donation in England: A qualitative interview study.
Bailey, Pippa K; Lyons, Hannah; Caskey, Fergus J; Ben-Shlomo, Yoav; Al-Talib, Mohammed; Babu, Adarsh; Selman, Lucy E.
Afiliação
  • Bailey PK; Department of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
  • Lyons H; Department of Renal Medicine, Southmead Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK.
  • Caskey FJ; Department of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
  • Ben-Shlomo Y; Leeds School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
  • Al-Talib M; Department of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
  • Babu A; Department of Renal Medicine, Southmead Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK.
  • Selman LE; Department of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Health Expect ; 25(2): 607-616, 2022 04.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34951093
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

In 2020 England moved to an opt-out deceased donation law. We aimed to investigate the views of a mixed stakeholder group comprising people with kidney disease, family members and healthcare practitioners towards the change in legislation. We investigated the expected impacts of the new legislation on deceased-donor and living-donor transplantation, and views on media campaigns regarding the law change.

METHODS:

We undertook in-depth qualitative interviews with people with kidney disease (n = 13), their family members (n = 4) and healthcare practitioners (n = 15). Purposive sampling was used to ensure diversity for patients and healthcare practitioners. Family members were recruited through snowball sampling and posters. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Transcripts were analysed using thematic analysis.

RESULTS:

Three themes with six subthemes were identified (i) Expectations of impact (Hopeful patients; Cautious healthcare professionals), (ii) Living-donor transplantation (Divergent views; Unchanged clinical recommendations), (iii) Media campaigns (Single message; Highlighting recipient benefits). Patients expected the law change would result in more deceased-donor transplant opportunities.

CONCLUSIONS:

Clinicians should ensure patients and families are aware of the current evidence regarding the impact of opt-out consent expectations of an increased likelihood of receiving a deceased-donor transplant are not currently supported by the evidence. This may help to prevent a decline in living-donor transplantation seen in other countries with similar legislation. Media campaigns should include a focus on the impact of organ receipt. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION Two patient representatives from the Kidney Disease Health Integration Team, Primrose Granville and Soumeya Bouacida, contributed to the content and design of the study documents.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Obtenção de Tecidos e Órgãos / Motivação Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Qualitative_research Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Health Expect Assunto da revista: PESQUISA EM SERVICOS DE SAUDE / SAUDE PUBLICA Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Obtenção de Tecidos e Órgãos / Motivação Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Qualitative_research Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Health Expect Assunto da revista: PESQUISA EM SERVICOS DE SAUDE / SAUDE PUBLICA Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido