Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Pilot study of a novel transmembranous electromyography device for assessment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal muscles.
Menon, Deepak; Mansfield, Perry; Cordice, Derrick; Studer, Chris; O'Leary, Michael; Sheean, Geoffrey; Bril, Vera.
Afiliação
  • Menon D; Ellen & Martin Prosserman Centre for Neuromuscular Diseases, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Mansfield P; Division of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Senta Clinic, San Diego, California, USA.
  • Cordice D; Division of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Senta Clinic, San Diego, California, USA.
  • Studer C; Powell Mansfield, Inc, San Diego, California, USA.
  • O'Leary M; Division of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Senta Clinic, San Diego, California, USA.
  • Sheean G; Powell Mansfield, Inc, San Diego, California, USA.
  • Bril V; Ellen & Martin Prosserman Centre for Neuromuscular Diseases, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Muscle Nerve ; 65(3): 303-310, 2022 03.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34952972
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION/

AIMS:

Electromyography (EMG) can provide valuable insights into the pathophysiology of oropharyngeal muscles in various disease states, but the invasive nature of the conventional needle EMG (nEMG) has its limitations in this setting. We aimed to examine the inter-rater reliability (IRR) of a novel transmembranous EMG (tmEMG) sensor as a non-invasive technique for assessment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal muscles for neuromuscular pathology.

METHODS:

The study was a prospective, cohort, pilot study with blinded data analysis in healthy participants (n = 6), patients with moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) (n = 5) and bulbar amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) (n = 5). Each patient underwent sampling from bilateral palatoglossus (PG) and genioglossus (GG), using both tmEMG and nEMG. IRR was expressed as percentage agreement and prevalence-adjusted bias-adjusted kappa coefficient (PABAK).

RESULTS:

Substantial IRR was found for participants with ALS (81.6%, PABAK 0.63) and OSA (78.8%, PABAK 0.61), and in healthy participants (87.1%, PABAK 0.74). A better IRR was seen with tmEMG (95.7%, PABAK 0.92) than with nEMG (73.9%, PABAK 0.48) for healthy participants and also for those with OSA. Studies from GG had higher IRR than PG. Only one participant had a minor adverse event (sore throat).

DISCUSSION:

The current study shows that analysis of PG and GG in both healthy and disease states using tmEMG has high IRR compared with nEMG analysis. Further validation studies can be undertaken to test its utility in analysis of oral cavity and oropharyngeal muscles.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Língua / Músculos Faciais Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Muscle Nerve Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Canadá

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Língua / Músculos Faciais Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Muscle Nerve Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Canadá