Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Physiologically based pharmacokinetic model predictions of natural product-drug interactions between goldenseal, berberine, imatinib and bosutinib.
Adiwidjaja, Jeffry; Boddy, Alan V; McLachlan, Andrew J.
Afiliação
  • Adiwidjaja J; Sydney Pharmacy School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia. jadi8091@uni.sydney.edu.au.
  • Boddy AV; Faculty of Pharmacy, Gadjah Mada University, Yogyakarta, Special Region of Yogyakarta, 55281, Indonesia. jadi8091@uni.sydney.edu.au.
  • McLachlan AJ; Clinical & Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, 5001, Australia.
Eur J Clin Pharmacol ; 78(4): 597-611, 2022 Apr.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35048143
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

This study implements a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modelling approach to predict the effect of hydrastine and berberine, two major alkaloids present in goldenseal extract, on pharmacokinetics of imatinib and bosutinib.

METHODS:

PBPK models of hydrastine and berberine were developed in the Simcyp Simulator (version 17), integrating prior in vitro knowledge and published clinical pharmacokinetic data. The models account for reversible and irreversible (mechanism-based) inhibition of CYP3A enzymes as well as inhibition of the P-glycoprotein transporter. Inhibitory potencies of hydrastine and berberine on imatinib and bosutinib were estimated based on in vitro inhibition of metabolite formation.

RESULTS:

The PBPK models provided reliable estimates on the magnitude of interactions due to co-administration of goldenseal extract or high-dose berberine on substrates of CYP3A enzymes (midazolam, indinavir and cyclosporine) and P-glycoprotein (digoxin). PBPK simulations predicted a moderate twofold increase (5th to 95th percentiles of prediction of 1.4-3.1) in systemic exposure (AUC) of bosutinib when co-administered with clinically relevant doses of goldenseal extract. A high dose of berberine (300 mg thrice daily) was also expected to affect bosutinib exposure, albeit to a lesser extent than that predicted with goldenseal (AUC ratio of 1.3, 5th to 95th percentile 1.1-1.6). Conversely, the corresponding effects on imatinib exposure are unlikely to be of clinical importance (predicted AUC ratios of 1.0-1.2).

CONCLUSION:

PBPK model-based predictions highlighted potential clinically significant interactions between goldenseal extract and bosutinib, but not imatinib. Dose adjustment may need to be considered if co-administration is desirable. These findings should be confirmed with optimally designed controlled drug interaction studies.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Berberina / Produtos Biológicos / Hydrastis Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Clin Pharmacol Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Austrália

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Berberina / Produtos Biológicos / Hydrastis Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Clin Pharmacol Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Austrália