Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Rapid assessment of insect pollination services to inform decision-making.
Ratto, Fabrizia; Breeze, Tom D; Cole, Lorna J; Garratt, Michael P D; Kleijn, David; Kunin, Bill; Michez, Denis; O'Connor, Rory; Ollerton, Jeff; Paxton, Robert J; Poppy, Guy M; Potts, Simon G; Senapathi, Deepa; Shaw, Rosalind; Dicks, Lynn V; Peh, Kelvin S-H.
Afiliação
  • Ratto F; School of Biological Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
  • Breeze TD; School of Biology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
  • Cole LJ; Centre for Agri-Environmental Research, School of Agriculture, Policy and Development, University of Reading, Reading, UK.
  • Garratt MPD; Integrated Land Management, Environment & Society, SRUC, Ayr, UK.
  • Kleijn D; Centre for Agri-Environmental Research, School of Agriculture, Policy and Development, University of Reading, Reading, UK.
  • Kunin B; Resource Ecology Group, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
  • Michez D; School of Biology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
  • O'Connor R; Laboratoire de Zoologie, Université de Mons, Mons, Belgium.
  • Ollerton J; Centre for Agri-Environmental Research, School of Agriculture, Policy and Development, University of Reading, Reading, UK.
  • Paxton RJ; Faculty of Arts, Science and Technology, University of Northampton, Northampton, UK.
  • Poppy GM; General Zoology, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany.
  • Potts SG; German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
  • Senapathi D; School of Biological Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
  • Shaw R; Centre for Agri-Environmental Research, School of Agriculture, Policy and Development, University of Reading, Reading, UK.
  • Dicks LV; Centre for Agri-Environmental Research, School of Agriculture, Policy and Development, University of Reading, Reading, UK.
  • Peh KS; Environment and Sustainability Institute, University of Exeter, Penryn, UK.
Conserv Biol ; 36(4): e13886, 2022 08.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35075685
ABSTRACT
Pollinator declines have prompted efforts to assess how land-use change affects insect pollinators and pollination services in agricultural landscapes. Yet many tools to measure insect pollination services require substantial landscape-scale data and technical expertise. In expert workshops, 3 straightforward methods (desk-based method, field survey, and empirical manipulation with exclusion experiments) for rapid insect pollination assessment at site scale were developed to provide an adaptable framework that is accessible to nonspecialist with limited resources. These methods were designed for TESSA (Toolkit for Ecosystem Service Site-Based Assessment) and allow comparative assessment of pollination services at a site of conservation interest and in its most plausible alternative state (e.g., converted to agricultural land). We applied the methods at a nature reserve in the United Kingdom to estimate the value of insect pollination services provided by the reserve. The economic value of pollination services provided by the reserve ranged from US$6163 to US$11,546/year. The conversion of the reserve to arable land would provide no insect pollination services and a net annual benefit from insect-pollinated crop production of approximately $1542/year (US$24∙ha-1 ∙year-1 ). The methods had wide applicability and were readily adapted to different insect-pollinated crops rape (Brassica napus) and beans (Vicia faba) crops. All methods were rapidly employed under a low budget. The relatively less robust methods that required fewer resources yielded higher estimates of annual insect pollination benefit.
RESUMEN
Diversidad y Conservación de Gasterópodos Subterráneos de Agua Dulce en los Estados Unidos y en México Resumen Las declinaciones de los polinizadores han impulsado los esfuerzos por evaluar cómo el cambio del uso de suelo afecta a los insectos polinizadores y los servicios de polinización en los paisajes agrícolas. Aun así, muchas de las herramientas para medir los servicios de los insectos polinizadores requieren datos sustanciales a escala de paisaje y el conocimiento de expertos. Desarrollamos tres métodos sencillos (método de gabinete, censo de campo y manipulación empírica con experimentos de exclusión) durante algunos talleres de expertos para la evaluación rápida de la polinización por insectos a escala de sitio con el objetivo de proporcionar un marco de trabajo adaptable y accesible para quienes no son especialistas y cuentan con recursos limitados. Estos métodos fueron diseñados para TESSA (Toolkit for Ecosystem Service Site-Based Assessment, en inglés) y permiten la evaluación comparativa de los servicios de polinización en los sitios de interés para la conservación y su estado alternativo más plausible (p. ej. convertido a suelo agrícola). Aplicamos los métodos en una reserva natural del Reino Unido para estimar el valor de los servicios de polinización por insectos que proporciona la reserva. El valor económico de los servicios de polinización que proporciona la reserva varió desde US$6,163 a US$11,546 al año-1 . La conversión de la reserva a suelo arable no proporcionaría servicios de polinización por insectos, pero sí un beneficio anual neto a partir de la producción de cultivos polinizados por insectos de aproximadamente $1,542 al año-1 (US$24 ha-1 año-1 ). Los métodos tuvieron una aplicabilidad generalizada y estaban ya adaptados a los diferentes cultivos polinizados por insectos cultivos de colza (Brassica napus) y habas (Vicia faba). Todos los métodos pudieron usarse con bajo presupuesto. Los métodos relativamente menos robustos que requirieron menos recursos produjeron estimados más elevados del beneficio anual de la polinización por insectos.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Produtos Agrícolas / Polinização Limite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: Conserv Biol Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Produtos Agrícolas / Polinização Limite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: Conserv Biol Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido