Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Contrast-enhanced digital breast tomosythesis and breast MRI to monitor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: patient tolerance and preference.
Savaridas, Sarah L; Whelehan, Patsy; Warwick, Violet R; Vinnicombe, Sarah J; Evans, Andrew J.
Afiliação
  • Savaridas SL; School of Medicine, University of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital & Medical School, Dundee, UK.
  • Whelehan P; School of Medicine, University of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital & Medical School, Dundee, UK.
  • Warwick VR; School of Medicine, University of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital & Medical School, Dundee, UK.
  • Vinnicombe SJ; School of Medicine, University of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital & Medical School, Dundee, UK.
  • Evans AJ; Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cheltenham, UK.
Br J Radiol ; 95(1134): 20210779, 2022 Jun 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35143334
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Contrast-enhanced digital breast tomosynthesis (CE-DBT) is a novel imaging technique, combining contrast-enhanced spectral mammography and tomosynthesis. This may offer an alternative imaging technique to breast MRI for monitoring of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. This paper addresses patient experience and preference regarding the two techniques.

METHODS:

Conducted as part of a prospective pilot study; patients were asked to complete questionnaires pertaining to their experience of CE-DBT and MRI following pre-treatment and end-of-treatment imaging. Questionnaires consisted of eight questions answered on a categorical scale, two using a visual analogue scale (VAS), and a question to indicate preference of imaging technique. Statistical analysis was performed with Wilcoxon signed rank test and McNemar test for related samples using SPSS v. 25.

RESULTS:

18 patients were enrolled in the pilot study. Matched CE-DBT and MRI questionnaires were completed after 22 patient episodes. Patient preference was indicated after 31 patient episodes. Overall, on 77% of occasions patients preferred CE-DBT with no difference between pre-treatment and end-of-treatment imaging. Overall experience (p = 0.008), non-breast pain (p = 0.046), anxiety measured using VAS (p = 0.003), and feeling of being put at ease by staff (p = 0.023) was better for CE-DBT. However, more breast pain was experienced during CE-DBT when measured on both VAS (p = 0.011) and categorical scale (p = 0.021).

CONCLUSION:

Our paper suggests that patients prefer CE-DBT to MRI, adding further evidence in favour of contrast-enhanced mammographic techniques. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE Contrast mammographic techniques offer an alternative, more accessible imaging technique to breast MRI. Whilst other studies have addressed patient experience of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography, this is the first study to directly explore patient preference for CE-DBT over MRI in the setting of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, finding that overall, patients preferred CE-DBT despite the relatively long breast compression.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Mama / Terapia Neoadjuvante Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Limite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Br J Radiol Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Mama / Terapia Neoadjuvante Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Limite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Br J Radiol Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido