Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Efficacy and safety of ebastine dose escalation in chronic urticaria: A prospective study.
Qian, Tian; Li, Shifei; Chen, Qiquan; Zhang, Daojun; Song, Zhiqiang; Hao, Fei.
Afiliação
  • Qian T; Dermatology and Plastic Surgery Center, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
  • Li S; Department of Dermatology, Southwest Hospital, Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), Chongqing, China.
  • Chen Q; Department of Dermatology, Southwest Hospital, Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), Chongqing, China.
  • Zhang D; Dermatology and Plastic Surgery Center, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
  • Song Z; Department of Dermatology, Southwest Hospital, Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), Chongqing, China.
  • Hao F; Dermatology and Plastic Surgery Center, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Dermatol Ther ; 35(5): e15386, 2022 05.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35179272
ABSTRACT
The second-generation antihistamines at licensed doses are first-line treatment in urticaria and up-dosing is recommended as second-line treatment. To assess the efficacy and safety of escalated doses of ebastine in patients with chronic urticaria (CU), we designed this study. Recruited patients with CU were treated with increasing doses of ebstine. Treatment started at the daily dose of 10 mg. The symptom is assessed weekly, and if there is no significant improvement, the dose is increased from 10 mg to 20 mg, and if still no significant improvement, up to 40 mg. Pruritus, number, diameter, duration and frequency of wheals, and adverse reactions were assessed. One hundred and forty (76.50%) patients achieved marked effect with ebastine 10 mg/day, 27 (14.75%) patients with ebastine 20 mg/day and 13 (7.10%) patients with ebastine 40 mg/day, while 3(1.64%) patients did not get marked effect. There was no significant difference of effect between factitious urticaria, CSU, cholinergic urticaria and CSU with factitious urticaria in different dose (all p > 0.05). Common adverse reactions of ebstine treatment, included dry mouth, somnolence, tiredness and headache, were mild or moderate. There was no significant difference between the degree score of dry mouth with different doses of ebastine, and the same to somnolence, tiredness and headache (all p > 0.05). Doses escalation of ebastine should be effective in treatment of factitious urticaria, CSU and cholinergic urticaria with poorly treated by standard of double doses. Increasing ebastine dose did not increase the incidence of adverse reactions.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Urticária / Xerostomia / Urticária Crônica Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Dermatol Ther Assunto da revista: DERMATOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Urticária / Xerostomia / Urticária Crônica Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Dermatol Ther Assunto da revista: DERMATOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China